C 



nd ncrvum vicirmm , dtim ponit ad minimum 

 qijrnfcani ends partem nerds conilare ; osfium au- 

 com , inorbo aftectornm , dolores explicandos esfe , 

 vcl ab osils tumore, vicinas partes ftimulance , 

 \ r el a morbofa vafortim fanguiferorum osfis ec pe- 

 a'iostei conditione, vel ab ipforiTin nervorum, 

 vafa ilia adcuntium , affectione , pri'iiario afFectis 

 inaioribus ramis, e quibqs deducuntur- Ad 

 haec R e i 1 i u s fequentia animadvercic : qtiodfi 

 <juinta tantum cutis pars nervis conftet , punc- 

 tura in parte, nervo carente, per presiionera in 

 vicinum fenfationem producerec; haec antem 

 ab ncutisfimo acu excitata, in quovis cutis 

 puncco. Temper eadem est, dum presfione in 

 ncrvum fub ec circumiacentem , fenfus plane di- 

 verfus excitari deberet ab illo , quern ipfins nervi 

 punctio producic ; deinde probatu difficillimum es- 

 fee 9 recentis calli in osfibqs fractis Jenfilicatem, 

 nervis, u-bique in eo disperfis, pendcre (*). 



Attamen animadvertendum esc , H u m b o 1 d- 

 tium proprie non confirmasfe Rcilii con- 

 iecturam: hunc enim rem alio modo intellexis- 

 fe, ex ipforiHn verbis luculenter patec, 



H u m b o.l d t i u s fell, e narratis experimen- 

 tis hancce concluiionem deducit (f) : ?> ^ an 



kann 



(*) R 6 i 1 , /. c. p> fi-oo , in twfa. 

 Ct) / c. p. 3 1 8. 



