matrimonio fumpfit, qune nupta prins Clodicr 

 frt postea Curioni fuerat , ,, ?uvxioy* testimonies 

 5 y PJiuarchi fi), 0y m/Ucr/tfi>, qu$e olxovpi&x 

 , Qpovo~v , fo^l .fo^fiq tSiuT&v wpstTsiv afyovv i #A- 



Neqne a ioco eicgans ille 

 aucror fe abilinere potuir, qnippe 

 rp^v" pergit J/^r^A/^- 4>ovAj 

 5, Tuuicv yuvaixoKpxtriX'S o 

 5, x^) Xfx&ib&ywnW&Wv tin* 

 5, ^ : yi/^/^wj/, jrof&faiflw*** avrov (2).'' StU- 

 debac autem ipfe Triumvir coniugem variis ar-" 

 tibus mitiorem reddere, quod tamen parum 

 prospere illi cesfisfc , mox apparcbic. 



Sed uc incegram niulieris indolem cognosca- 

 nuis , quae rn hidoria - Romana nomen fatis fa- 

 inofum fibi comparavit, parumper ad fuperiora 

 rcvertendum eric. 



Quum atrocem Clodium Milo inrcrfecisfec, 

 Fuivia mariti necis acerrima exflitic ultrix. 

 Nam ubi cadaver yesperd Ramam perlatnm es- 

 fee , et infima plebs ac fervorum raaxima tufba- 

 Ingenues circum corpus, in atrro domns pod- 

 turn, aditarenc, Fuivia invidiam facci auge- 



bat ? 



0) 1. 1. p* 9^0. cf. id. eod. p. p.2^, ec Florus 

 IV. 5. 

 (2 ) Plutarch, 1. 1. p?g, 530. 



