219 



(which includes, as a particular case, the remarkable law for deter- 

 mining the angle of polarisation of light reflected at the surface of 

 an ordinary medium, discovered by Sir David Brewster,) namely, 

 that when the light reflected from the surface of a doubly refract- 

 ing crystal is completely polarised, or, in other words, when the 

 reflected vibration has a determined direction, independent of the 

 direction of the incident vibration, then tlie reflected ray is jper- 

 pendicular to the intersection of the jpolar planes of the two df- 

 fetent refracted rays. i 



In this and other applications of the theorem of the polar plane 

 to the case where the incident light is polarised so as to undergo a 

 double refraction, the obvious manner of proceeding is to decompose 

 its one hiradial vibration into two uniradial vibrations, and to treat 

 these separately, by applying to each the construction above described. 

 Yet Mr. Mac Cullagh remarks, that it requires proof that the reflected 

 and refracted intensities, thus determined, will have their sum ex- 

 actly equal to the intensity of the incident light ; or, in other words, 

 that the law of the ms viva will hold good for the resultant vibra- 

 tions, though we know, by the construction, that it holds good for 

 each system of uniradial components taken separately. In fact, if the 

 two separate incident vibrations, which correspond to the two sepa- 

 rate refracted vibrations, be inclined at an acute angle to each other, 

 they will generate by their superposition (according to the law of 

 interference) a compound incident light, of which the intensity ex- 

 ceeds, by a determined amount, the sum of the two separate or 

 component intensities ; and it requires proof that the two separate 

 reflected vibrations will in like manner be inclined to each other at 

 that precise acuteness of angle which will allow the intensity of the 

 compound reflected light to exceed, by precisely the same deter- 

 mined amount, the sum of the two separate intensities, correspond- 

 ing to the two separate reflected vibrations : (or that the same sort 

 of equality of differences between incident and reflected resultants 

 and sums will take place, when the angles are obtuse and not acute ;) 

 the two refracted vibrations being not in general (in either case) 

 superposed upon each other. Professor Mac Cullagh has arrived 

 at an equation of condition, as necessary for the foregoing agree- 

 ment, which expresses a property of the laws of propagation de- 



