IQOl] ENTOMOLOGICAL NEWS. 175 



coupe anterieurment et muni d'une petite cornu dessous de la 

 corne il y a un petit enfoncement. " I also referred to Drury's 

 fig : (Exotic Ins :) which I found much better & more obviously 

 characteristic than that of Olivier The Ins: I sent you as Mo- 

 lossus comes nearest to Olivier 's fig & description of S. Buceph- 

 alus & so I have named it in my collection. 



As to the large Buprestis, specimens of which you sent me 

 with the supposition of its being the B. Mariana, I cannot posi- 

 tively say what species it is referable to, but it is probable I 

 think that it is no other than the Mariana Fabricius, S) r st. 

 Eleut. says it inhabits ' ' Europa boreali ' ' he refers to Drury 

 Vol i t 30 & to Herbst : Arch : t 28 f. 4 these two figures 

 differ very much from each other, the latter was designed from 

 the European specimen, & the former from a specimen capt- 

 ured in Virginia, & very probably the difference observable be- 

 tween the two figures, is owing to the little care taken in the 

 drawing or engraving In Turton's L,in : an insect is de- 

 scribed under the name Virginica which is doubtless intended 

 for the insect in question, he refers to this same fig. of Drury 

 before mentioned Fab. Syst. Eleut, omits this specific name 

 (Virginica) no doubt judging it to be the same precisely with 

 the European Mariana Turton says of Mariana that it In- 

 habits New Holland & does not give it as an European Insect 

 at all Olivier on the other hand says it inhabits in all Europe 

 & also in America So that you will see that the thing is not 

 settled Paykull. Faun. Suec. gives a description somewhat in 

 detail, agreeing very well with our insect I have not access to 

 Petiver's Gazoph but that work is not quoted in the Syst : 

 Eleut : under the species Mariana The sinus in the terminal 

 abdominal segment of the male is indeed remarkably conspicu- 

 ous, the same conformation occurs though less obviously in 

 some other Insects the only ones which at present occur to me 

 as exhibiting the truth of this remark are the Cicindelse, in 

 some of the males of which, this structure is perceptible, tS: the 

 tail of the females in many instances is canaliculated in a simi- 

 lar manner The specimen you allude to marked />. I should 

 suppose is but a variety it is however of a larger size & less 



