BARTOW: SANITARY CHEMICAL WATER ANALYSES. 



109 



The water for analyses 2G, 33, 57, 90, 186 and 190 was drawn 

 from a tap at 1344 Ohio street; for 190, 205, and 220, from a 

 tap at the University ; for 111, from a tap at the water-works ; 

 112, from a tap at 920 Tennessee street, and 113, from a hy- 

 drant at Oak Hill cemetery. These three (111-113) formed a 

 comparative analysis. 193, 200, 209 and 215 were analyses of 

 water from the fountain. The water was clear when first col- 

 lected, but on standing would become turbid, and a sediment 

 would settle out. 201, 210 and 216 are from the second reser- 

 voir, and 202, 211 and 217 are from the third reservoir. Three 

 sets of comparative analyses of the water from the fountain and 

 the second and third reservoirs were made. The most remark- 

 able item noted was the very high free ammonia in the foun- 

 tain, with the gradual decrease in the reservoirs, and the still 

 further decrease noted in the water from the taps. 



Numbers 233 and 234 were comparative analyses, on the same 

 day, of water from different parts of the city. 



Table IX. — • Analyses of water from springs in or near the city of Lawrence. 



(Parts per 1,000,000.) 



Analyses 47 and 156 are of spring-water from the residence of B. W. Woodward. 

 116, a spring at Mrs. Duncan's, west of Lawrence. 

 138, a spring in the 1400 block on Ohio street. 



Analyses 76 and 149 are from the deep well near the Santa Fe freight station at Lawrence. 

 Analyses 170 and 171 are from a woll at Tonganoxie. 



