915 



Van der Valk, A. G. 1974. Environmental factors controlling the distribution 



of forbs on coastal foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Canadian 



Journal of Botany 52:1057-1073. 



916 

 *Warner, L. 1976. The status of the barrier islands of southeastern coast: 

 a summary of the barrier islands inventory. Open Space Institute, New 

 York and Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, N.Y. 43 pp. 



The pertinent data from Warner and Strauss (1976) were summarized in 

 this abbreviated report. 



917 



*Warner, L., and D. Strauss. 1976. Inventory of the barrier islands of the 



southeastern coast. Open Space Institute, New York, and Natural Resources 



Defense Council, New York, N.Y. 300 pp. 



This inventory of the barrier islands of Virginia, North Carolina, South 

 Carolina, and Georgia summarizes information on each island's size (all 

 over 200 acres), development status, ownership, property assessments, and 

 local land-use regulations. Of the 81 islands in the study area, 27 were 

 largely owned by the State or Federal Government; 9 were owned by private, 

 nonprofit organizations; and the remaining 45 islands were predominantly 

 privately owned. The authors state that nearly half the privately owned 

 islands were threatened by recent and anticipated real estate development. 



918 

 *Woodhouse, W. W., Jr., E. D. Seneca, and S. W. Broome. 1976. Ten years of 

 development of man-initiated coastal barrier dunes in North Carolina. 

 North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Agricultural Experiment 

 Station, Bulletin 453. 53 pp. 



Discusses sand dune restoration with American beachgrass, sea oats, and 

 sand fences over a 10-year period along North Carolina's coast. 



Bodie Island 



, Waits. 1973. Vegetation types in an irregularly 

 the North Carolina Outer Banks. Journal of the 

 Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 89:78-91. 



Cape Hatteras 



920 



Dolan, R. 1972. Beach erosion and beach nourishment, Cape Hatteras, North 

 Carolina. National Park Service, Natural Resource Report No. 4. 20 pp. 



196 



