460 ON CARABID.E FROM WEST AUSTRALIA 



44. H. RANQLA, Casteln. ; I.e. Sp. 694. i7a6.— Donnybrook 

 (Lea). 



45. H. PUNCTicoLLis, MacL; I.e. Supp. Sp. 7479. Hab. — Upper 

 Ord River (Helms). 



Though placed by 8ir William Macleay in the genus Harplaner, 

 it does not belong to it, as is suffieiently shown by the labial 

 palps having the penultimate joint with more than two setae in 

 front. Its short posterior tarsi indicate its position pretty 

 clearly. 



46. H. sp. ? (J. A single specimen of a species with testaceous 

 tibiae allied to //. dei/r-oUei, Casteln., but differing from that 

 species by its wider and more convex shape, the puncture of the 

 third interstice of the elytra placed nearer the apex, &c. The 

 posterior femora are not dentate on the underside, and the 

 posterior tibiiB are strongly arcuate. It is evidently an 

 undeseribed species, but I am not prepared to describe it on the 

 single specimen before me. 



I/ab. — Beverley (Lea). 



Cenogmus, n.gen. 



I propose this genus to receive Harpalus rotundifboUis, Casteln., 

 H. loaterhousei, Casteln., and Anisodactylus ojxicipennis, Chaud. 

 The remarks of both Baron Chaudoir and Mr. Blackburn on these 

 species suggest the necessity of a new genus, which can be readily 

 identified in the Australian fauna by the characters allotted to it 

 in the table above. 



47. C. ROTUNDicOLLis, Casteln.; I.e. Sp. 668. i/a6.— Pinjarrah 

 (Lea). 



48. C. WATERHOUSEi, Casteln.; I.e. Sp, 669. Hab. — Geraldton 

 and MuUewa (Lea). 



Genus Harplaner. 



49. H. VELOX, Casteln.; I.e. Sp. 670. Hab. — Newcastle, Swan 

 River, Beverley, Rottnest Island (Lea). 



Evidently plentiful in the Swan River District; it is said by 

 de Castelnau to be common near Melbourne. I have not seen it 



