ENUMEKATIO FILICUM PHILIPPINARUM. 399 



Scliott), but are produced on tlie confluence of several 

 venules as in the preceding genus Drynaria, and differino- 

 only from Drynaria quercifolia, and coronatis, by the upper 

 and fertile portion of the fi ond being contracted into rachi- 

 form pinnje, bearing a row of small round sori on each side 

 of their midrib; and therefore Aglaoinorpha is not so charac- 

 teristic as a distinct genus, as its singular appearance would 

 lead one to imagine. 



Dryostachium, J. Sm. 



53. D. splendens, J. Sm. — Luzon ; {n. 87.) 



54. D. pilosum, J. Sm. — Luzon ; (n. 90.) 



Obs, What I have said with regard to the affinity ofAgla^ 

 omorpha with Drynaria quercifolia and coronans, might with 

 equal propriety be applied to the two species forming this 

 genus ; and the only reason that has induced me to separate 

 them from Aglaomorpha is their very remarkable large amor- 

 phous-like sori ; the formation of the receptacle being rather 

 singular, especially as regards the first species ; in the second 

 the sporangia are pilose like Drynaria crassifolia. 



Lecanopteris, Blume. 



55. L. carnosa, Blume. — Leyte; (n. 312.) 



Obs. This appears to be a very rare fern, there being only 

 four specimens in the collection. 



Selliguea, Bory; Blume. 



56. S. membranacea, Blume. — Samar; (n. 825, 334.) 



57. S. macrophylla, Blume. — Bohol; («. 351.) 



58. S. Jlavescens. — Graramitis jflavescens, JVall — Luzon; 

 {n. 12.) 



59. S. pothifolia. — Hemionitis pothifolia, Ham.; D. Don. 

 — -Grammitis decurrens, Wall; Hook. — Luzon: {n. 53.) 

 Samar ; {». 3*20.) 



DiBLEMMA, J. Sm. 



60. D. Samarensis, J. Sm. — Samar; (n. 332.) 



Obs. This simple-looking fern has the venation of Dryna- 

 ria and Drymoglossum, and is peculiar in having the simple 



