386 BOTANY OF THE AZORES., 
myself, and not finding any description of the species in the 
Prodromus of De Candolle, I published it as new, under 
the above name. I have no doubt now, that it is the H. 
perforatum of the Flora Azorica, although clearly distin- 
guished from the Linnean perforatum, by its tetrapterant 
stem and other less obvious characters. 
45. Ilex Perado (Ait.)—Possibly two species in the 
Azores; one with broader, more obtuse, and entire leaves; 
the other with the more oval leaves spinulose, or very acutely 
serrate at the margin. But we cannot found a diagnosis on 
such differences in an Jlex, unless accompanied by some 
other character, and the flowers and. fruit of the second form 
are yet unknown to me. Dr. Seubert considers the two 
forms as a single species. And Dr. C. Lemann unites 
the Canary J. platyphylla (Webb) to the present species — 
also. 
76. Rubus Hochstetterorum (Seub.)—* A large southern ^ 
form of R. fruticosus” P. B. Webb. lf so, all our British 
Rubi are also but forms of R. fruticosus. 
_ 99. ** Daucus polygamus (Gouan)."—Having received some 
additional specimens from Mr. Hunt, I can now confidently 
say, that there are two species, perhaps more, in the Azores 
The two correspond tolerably well with our two Enghs) 
species, Carota and maritimus, or Hispanicus. Those bagi 
to my eyes, look like D. Carota, are referred by Dr. C. nd 
Lemann to the D. neglectus (Lowe.) jd dee + 
. 100. * Umbellifera.” (Petroselinum Seubertianum, w 
| EV —Mr. Hunt informs me that my No. 100 must is usd 
Ne “The pa Bat cited by Seubert (De Cand. i 
is sufficiently applicable to bear out Mr. Hunt’s sugge 
the fruit of the Azoric plant being unknown at the de 
Seubert’s Flora. But assuredly the plant of the Á 
belongs to a different genus, by its fruit; and it prese 
other sufficient. distinctions from a specimen of the Kuni 
meui, shown to me by Dr. C. Lemann. The fruit is 
