( 707 ) 



discal band and the discocudlnlar l>and is uarrowfr thau the postdiscal band, while 

 in nearly every specimen from other districts tliis interspace is wider at and before 

 lower angle of cell than the black postdiscal band. On the hindwing, the black 

 snbmedian line of the underside is rather heavy beyond cell, ending in a black spot 

 M' — M- which is larger than in ordinary autosilaus. 



The black bands are on the whole rather narrower in tlie specimens from 

 Bolivia, Sonth-Eastern Pern and Goyaz (Brazil) than in the individuals from the 

 more northern localities (Pern, Ecuador, Amazons). 



Eimer's fig. 9, I.e., said to be taken from an Amazonian specimen, has a very 

 short hindwing, the anal area being far less prolonged than is the case in all our 

 specimens. The individual which served as model may have been an imperfectly 

 developed specimen. 



JJaL Bolivia to Eastern Ecuador ; Amazons; Goyaz; Guiana; Orinoco. 



In the Tring Museum 140 cj c? from: Suapure, Caure R., Orinoco, February 

 and June 1899 (S. M. Klages) ; Essequibo R., Brit. Guiana; British Guiana; 

 Manicore ; Ljuitos ; R. Cachyaco, affl. of R. Huallaga (Stuart) ; Zamora, Ecuador 

 (0. T. Baron) ; Loja ; Archidona (W. Goodfellow); R. Ghuchuras, affl. of R. Palcazn, 

 320 m. (W. Hoffmanns); Palcazu (Sedlmayr) ; Chanchamayo (Scbnnke) ; Perene R., 

 3000 ft., October -November 1902 (Watkins & Tomlinson) ; Per(^n6 R., March 1900 

 (.Simniis) : Caradoc, Marcapata, Eebruary 19U1, 4O0i) ft. (Ockeuden) ; Montanas, 

 R. Madre de Dios, September 1901 (Ockeuden); R. Slucuri, Carabaya, June 1901, 

 2000 ft., dry season (Ockeuden); Chirimayo, Carabaya, lOoO ft., July 1901 

 (Ockenden) ; Callanga, (Juzco, l-oOO m. (Garle])p) ; Cajon, Cuzco, September 1900 

 (Garlepp); Mapiri ; Reyes, R. Beui, August 1895 (Stuart); R. Tanampaya (Garlepp); 

 Yungas de La Paz, December 1899 (Garlepp) ; Province Sara, S. Cruz de la Sierra, 

 February — April 1904 (J. Steinbach) ; Sapucay, Paraguay, July 1902 (W. Foster) ; 

 Jatahy, Goyaz. 



149. Papilio glaucolaus Bates (1804) (PI. IX. fig. 03. 64. 05). 



Papilh, ijlaucolaus Bates, Eiil. Mi. Mag. i. p. 4. n. 7 (18G4) (Pauama). 



The species has not been recognised by any of the authors who liave dealt 

 with this group of Papilios. Staudinger, in Exot. Tag/, i. p. 18 (1884), speaks of 

 glaucolaus from Panama as being larger thau macrosiilaus from Honduras ; his 

 glaucolaus was doubtless protesilaus, since the true glaucolaus from Panama is 

 smaller thau the average specimens of maeros/'l'ius. In Eimer, Arfl). Venvamltsch. 

 Schm. p. 102 F /.8S9), the various species and snbspecies are all muddled up. In 

 this work glaucolaus is called the largest protesilaus, while in fact P. glaucolaus 

 from Panama and Colombia is decidedly smaller than the forms of P. protc.vlaus 

 with which it occurs together. 



We recognise three geographical forms o? glaucolaus. While the two northern 

 forms (Pauama and Colombia) are easily recognised by the distinctions in pattern, 

 the third subspecies almost exactly resembles P. protesilaus protesilaus, being 

 distinguishable with certainty only by comparison of the genitalia. 



S. Postdiscal Ijand of Ibrcwing more widely separate from lower angle of cell 

 than in P. p. protesilaus, or the hindwing more obtnsely dentate at R' and R' and 

 the posterior submarginal sjiots slightly huffish, the wings not being so irare white 

 as in P. p. protesilaus. 



Scent-organ as in P. prote.vlaus. 



