( 8) 



13. P. apollo bosniensis Slidiel. 

 1 d", 1 ?, Koricua, Bosnia ; 3 Jc?, 2 ? ?, Sarajevo, Bosnia. 



14. P. apollo grajus .Stichel. 



1 c?, 1 ?, Balkans ; 1 ?, Albania, ex cnll. Feldei- ; 1 ?, Greece, ex coll. Rr.der, 

 aberration with all black iuarkiny;s Ijrowiiisli grej'. 



lo. P. apollo liburnicus Hebel and Rogenhofcr. 

 3 (?c?, 2 ? ?, Velebit Moniitains, Croatia, ex coll. Felder ; 1 c?, 2 ? ?, ex coll. 

 Felder, Velebit ; 1 <S, Croatia; I ?, Croatia, ex coll. IJoder. 



1*5. P. apollo rubidus Frnbstorfer. 



1 (?, 1 ?, Tyrol ; 1 ?, Merau ; 1 ?, bred in Zoological (iaidrus, Londun. 



17. P. apollo montanus Stichel. 



1 c?, 1 ?, Pirchabriick, 13. vii. IS'.Hi, .sCl) metres ; o c?cJ, 1 ?, Sterzing, 7. vii. 

 1896, 946 metres; 3 S<S, Andraz, 22. vii. 1896, 1428 metres ; 2 <S <i , 1 ?, Tyrol ; 

 1 S, Kimer-See ; 1 S, Caprile, 19. vii. 1890, 1U29 metres. 



18. P. apollo apenninus Sticliel. 



2 SS, Italy! These two c?c? are nnlike any other I'onn 1 know, as the 

 hindwings are i)roduced into a distinct point on a line with tlie lower ocellus, and 

 their outline is thus distinctly angulated, and not round as iu all other forms of 

 r. apollo. Monsienr Oberthiir figures two sjiecimens sliowing a similar trait from 

 the Pyrenees, but these are monstrosities, having it only on one side. Some 

 females of the next race show slight traces. 



1 cJ ex coll. Felder is marked " Apennines," but although it is placed in the 

 collection under this name, I believe it is only a very large c? of P. apollo alhus 

 wrongly labelled. This form of apollo is stated by Stichel to be small, but I do 

 not tiiink, from what I have seen, it is constantly niuch smaller than the more 

 northern races. 



19. P. apollo siciliae Oberthur. 



o cJt?, 6 ? ?, Madonie Mountains, Sicily, .July (Geo. C. Kruger) ; 1 (f, Sicily, 

 ex coll. Felder. 



2i). P. apollo pumilus Stichel. 



9 SS, 1 ?, Aspromonte, near Reggio, 1600— 18U0 metres, July 1-3, 1907 

 (Oscar Nenmann). 



This form was first described by Stichel as a distinct subspecies {Berl. lint. 

 Zeit., vol. 51, p. 88, t. 2, f. 14), from two specimens marked "Sicily" in the 

 Berlin Museum. He then treated it as an aberration of xiciline in his " Fascicule " 

 5^, of Wytsujan's (ii'iierri, Iiiscctorum. It is, however, a i|uite distinct subsjieeies, 

 much more resembling Parwissiiis phochus jilioi'bim than any form of /'. iipollo. 

 If the two specimens iu Berlin really came from Sicily, which 1 doubt, they 

 probably came from Mount Etna, opposite Reggio, in which case apollo siciliae 

 would W. confined to the Madonie Mountains. The reason I doubt the alleged 

 locality ol' the ty|)es is that these Aspromonte specimens agree so minutely with 

 both Herr Stichel's figures iu Seitz and that quoted above. 



