THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 15 



Megalopygidfe (Lagoidcx). We recognized that the former did not belong 

 here ; but it seems nearer this family than any other, and was so placed, 

 pending further study of the South American fauna, when it will probably 

 find place in a new familj'. 



As to Eupoeya, I am inclined to believe that it belongs to the Mega- 

 lopygidae, though the branching of the radial nervules of primaries is rather 

 unlike the typical form, and Dr. Packard's figures do not show a branch 

 to vein i. 



I find that Sciathos pimctigera, Linn., belongs to the Megalopygidfe 

 (Kirby's Cat., p. 540, next to Sibine in the Limacodidae). 



The genera so far shown to belong to this family separate as follows : — 



Vein 7 arising nearer base than 9 Eupoeya, Pack. 



Vein 7 arising beyond 9. 

 Vein ID from a stalk. 



Veins 3-4 of secondaries stalked Carama, Walk. 



Veins 3-4 of secondaries not stalked. 



Vein 8 of secondaries united to 7 to outer third of 



cell Ochrosonia, H. S. 



Vein 8 united to 7 nearly to tip of cell. . . .Sciathos, Walk. 



Vein 10 of primaries from the cell Megalopyge, Hiibn. 



Eutheca ( Sapi?tella, Kirby^ mora, Grote. 

 Lord Walsingham has kindly sent me the following information : — 

 " An examination [of the type in the British Museum] shows it to be an 

 Anaphorid with 1 2 separate veins in the forewings and eight in the hind- 

 wings. I can scarcely distinguish it from Pseudanaphora arcanella, 

 Clem., of which it may be the $, which is unknown so far as I am 

 aware." The name may be removed from the list of unidentified Bomby- 

 ces, and the genera Eutheca, Grt, and Sapinella, Kirby, relegated to the 

 synonymy. 



CORRECTION. 



In the list of Dragonflies of Corunna, Mich. (C. E. xxvi., p. 345, 

 December, 1894), Calopteryx apicalis, Burm., should be Ca/opteryx 

 cequabilis, Say. D. S. Kellicott, 



