260 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 



are of a dull washed-out smoky luteous, having but the faintest tinge of 

 lemon, or sometimes none at all. One of these has been labelled 

 evagaria by Hulst, but up to the time of writing Mr. Taylor had not seen 

 this specimen. A Chicago specimen in Mr. Taylor's collection which he 

 has identified with Wv^^H-i, flavicaria is not, however, very sharply distinct 

 from some of the brownish or luteous specimens in the Calgary series. A 

 specimen in his collection agreeing with Packard's figure and description 

 oi occiduaria^\)\\\\\ZM\r\g no data, looks like CsiXg^xy Jlavicaria, but is 

 much brighter yellow. The plan of maculation is exactly the same in the 

 two Calgary forms. I never saw a female of either. 



529. D. brwineata, Thunb. — Not rare. Middle July to middle 

 Aua. 



530. D. Hulstiaria, Taylor, = siibalbaria, Hulst, nee Pack. (Can. 

 Ent., XXXVIII, 112, April, 1906). A male from head of Pine Creek, 

 taken on June 5lh, 1897, ^^ ^" ^^^' I'aylor's collection. I had had the 

 specimen standing in my series of Deilinia vario/aria, and, according to 

 Mr. Taylor, Dr. Dyar fell into the same trap in recording this species as 

 variolaria in the Kootenai list. I believe, however, that I saw both 

 species in Mr. Cockle's collection. Hulst, in the description oi sub alb aria 

 compares the species with erythremaria^ not variolai'ia, Virgi?ialis, 

 Hulst, seems to be an extremely close ally. 



531. D. dentiadodes, Hulst. — Two male specimens at light, July 

 22nd and 25th, 1905, one in fine condition, but the first ca]Uure rubbed. 

 Mr. Taylor says these are the first records for Canada. They bear a 

 striking resemblance to Sciagraphia denticulata, but are slightly larger, 

 though I recognized them on sight as something new to me. It was 

 described from Colorado, and the entire description is : "A species 

 almost the exact counterpart of S. denticulata, Grt., in appearance, from 

 some specimens of which I am not able to distinguish it by colour or 

 markings. It is, however, easily distinguished by the bipectinate antennae 

 of the male, and the sharply serrate antenna; of the female." It is not 

 unnatural to suppose that -aides was the termination which Hulst intended 

 to be printed, but the fact that the name is spelt the same way in the list 

 of species on the same page is at variance with the suggestion. 



532. D. sp. .?— Rare. 



533. D. sp. ? — Rather rare. Has rather heavier antennae than the 

 above, subapical mark less produced, and in the subterminal band more 

 closely resembles No. 534. I had this and the preceding mixed until 



