EUPATORIUMS OF PERU. 85 



Var. typicum (Hieron.), comb. nov. Hispid throughout; leaves 

 lanceolate. — E. klcinioidcs, forma typica Hieron. in Engl. Bog. Jahrb. 

 xxii. 782 (1897). — Peru without locality: according to Hier- 

 onymus, 1. c. 783. [Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Paraguay.] 



Var. subglabratum Hieron. Stems subglabrous or below sparingly 

 and shortly pilose; leaves linear-lanceolate, glabrate e.xcept on the 

 scabrid edge. — Hieron. 1. c. 782, as suhglabrata. OocHnium pauci- 

 denfation DC. Prod. v. 134 (1836). — Peru without locality: 

 Haenke according to DeCandolle, 1. c. [Argentina, southern Brazil.] 



Sect. V. Hebeclinium (DC.) Benth. (See Robinson, Proc. Am. 



Acad. liv. 327.) 



Key to Species. 



Heads 200-300-flowered ; leaves on winged auriculate-based 



petioles SI. E. nemorosum. 



Heads 50-75-flowered ; petioles not winged 82. E. macrophyllum. 



81. E. nemorosum Klatt in Engl. Bot. -Jahrb. viii. 35 (1887); 

 Robinson, Proc. Am. Acad. liv. 327, 366 (1918). E. pteropodum 

 Hieron. in Engl. Bot. Jahrb. xxi.x. 15 (1900).— Cajamarca: near 

 Tambillo, von Jelski, nos. 737, 738, according to Hieronymus, 1. c, 

 as E. pteropodum. [Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia.] 



82. E. MACROPHYLLUM L. Sp. PI. cd. 2, ii. 1175 (1763); Bak. in 

 Mart. Fl. Bras. vi. pt. 2, 345, t. 92 (1876) ; Robinson, Proc. Am. Acad, 

 liv. 329 (1918).— Cuzco: Santa Ana, alt. 900 m., Cook & Gilbert, no. 

 1443 (U. S.). Peru without locality: according to Baker, 1. c. 

 [Widely distributed in tropical and subtropical America.] 



Doubtful or Transferred Species and Varieties. 



E. adenophorum, var. perltvi.^num Hieron. in Engl. Bot. Jahrb. 

 xxxvi. 470 (1905). This problematic plant, collected in Cajamarca, 

 near Tambillo, by von Jclski, no. 661 (Berl., sterile fragm. Gr.), was 

 described by Hieronymus, 1. c, as a possible variety of E. adenophorum 

 Spreng. Syst. iii. 420 (1826). Sprengel's species, however, was a mere 

 renaming of the Mexican E. glandulosum HBK. Nov. Gen. et Spec, 

 iv. 122 (1820), on account of the earlier homonym of iSIichaux. As 

 the latter is universally relegated to synonomy, there appears at 



