OF ARTS AND SCIENCES. 149 



1847. lb., Voy. Delegorg. ii. 592 : Drusius (natalensis). These two 



species have nothing to do with Iliibner's genus. 



Doubleday, Wallengren, Butler, and Kirby have used the name in 

 the Boisduvalian sense. The name must fall before Migonitis. 



298. CUESSIDA.* 



1832-33. Swains., Zool. 111. ii. 94: Cressida (Heliconides, Harmon- 

 ides) designated as type. 



The name being drawn from the species upon wliich it is founded, it 

 falls. See Eurycus. 



299. Cricosoma. . 



18G5. Feld., Eeise Novara, 292 : leopardinum. Sole species, and 

 therefore type- 

 Used in same sense by Bates and Kirby. Although the name is 

 very close to Cricostoma (Klein, Moll. 1753), it differs etymologically. 



300. Crocozoxa. 



1865. Feld., Eeise Novara, 296 : Pheretima. Sole species, and there- 

 fore type. 



301. CUPHA. 



1820. Billb., Euum. Ins. 79 : Erymanthis. Sole species, and there- 

 fore type. See Messaras. 



302. CuPiDO. 



1801. Schrank, Fauna Boica, ii. i. 153, 206: I. Virgaureae, Hippo- 

 • thoe (Hippothoe, Chryseis), Phlteas, Dorilas (Circe) ; 



II. Ariou, Alcon, Seraiargus (Acis), Damon, Cyllarus 

 (Damoetas), Argiolus, Chiron (Eumedon), Corydon, 

 Thetis (Adonis), Alexis, Corydon (Agestis), Argns, 

 Battus, Argiades (Puer), Alsus (Puer); III. rubi, betuiae, 

 quercus, pruni, spini. 



1816. Hiibn., Verz. 77: uses it for Hymen (Liger), Amor, and 

 Chrysus. These have no generic connection with any of 

 Schrank's species, but the last of them is closely allied to 

 the species Cupido Linn., whicli may have been the cause 

 of Iliibner's selection. 



1871. Kirb., Syn. Cat. 345 : uses it in place of Lyccena of most 

 modern authors, including some three hundred species, 

 and among them all of Schrank's second section. 



The name may be retained for the group represented by the first 

 two species of the second section, with Arion for the type. [See p. 293.] 



