OF ARTS AND SCIENCES. 159 



c55. DoxocoPA. 



181 G. Iliibn., Verz. 49: Erminea, Iris, Ilia (Ilia, Astasia), Agathina, 



Polyxena (ICpilais). 

 1865. Herr.-SchaefF., ProJr. i. 80 : uses it for Idyia, Celtis, Argus, 



none of them Hiibner's species, although congeneric with 



Aijathiiia. 

 1872. Scufld., Syst. Rev. 9 : in accordance with Herrich-SchaefFer's 



use of the name, specifies Agathina as type. 



But it cannot so be considered, since Agathina must be referred to 

 Chlorippe (q. v ). Erminea lias been taken as the type of Apaturina, 

 Iris and Ilia belong to Potamis, and hence this group must be restricted 

 to Polyxena and its allies. 



356. Drucina. 

 1872. But!., Cist. Ent. i. 72: Leonata specified as type. 



357. Drusilla.* 



1820-21. Swains., Zobl. 111. i. i. 11 : Urania (Jairus), Horsfieldii. 



Urania (Jairus) specified as type. 



Used in same sense by Westwood : but the name falls before 

 Taenaris, and is preoccupied in Coleoptera (Leach, 1819). 



358. Dryas. 



1806. Hiibn., Tent. 1 : Paphia. Sole species, and therefore type. 

 1847. Boisd., Voy. Deleg. ii. 588 : uses it for Leda, which has 



nothing to do with the Iliibuerian genus, but belongs to 



a distinct family. 

 1865. Feld., Reise Novara, 305: uses it for Cinaron, which has 



nothing to do with either the Hiibnerian or the Boisdu- 



valian genus ! See Aculhua. 



Wallengren has followed Boisduval ; Bates has followed Felder ; and 

 Herrich-ScliaefTer, in his Prodromus, has followed both the one and the 

 other ! See Argynnis. 



359. D'Urbania. 

 1862. Trim., Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. [3] i. 400: Amakosa. Sole 

 species, and therefore type. 



360. Dyctis. 



1832. Boisd., Voy. Astrol. 138: Agendas. Sole species, and there- 

 fore type. 

 1851. Westw., Gen. Diurn. Lep. 353: the same. 



