104 PEOCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY 



27. Erodes. 

 1820. Dalm. in Billb., Enum. Ins. 79 : Idomeneus. Sole species^ 

 and therefore type. 

 If, however, this species is strictly congeneric with Eurylochus, the 

 genus will fall before the earlier Caligo (q. v.). 



28. ^ROPETES.* 



1820. Billb., Enum. Ins. 79 : Licus (Licas), Tulbaghia. 



There is a Castnian with the name of the first species, and it is prob- 

 ably the insect meant by Billberg, althougli the species is Drury's, and 

 not Fabricius's, as stated by the writer. The group as tlius constituted 

 consists of wholly incongruous material, and may be discarded. See 

 Meneris. 



29. ^THEIUS. 



1816. Hiibn., Verz. 109 : Pretus, Archytas, Meris. 



Archytas may be selected as type, altliough belonging to a different 

 fiiraily from the other two ; for it alone belongs to the group in which 

 Hiibner placed this genus. 



30. ^THILLA. 



1868. Hewits., Hesp. 55 : Eleusinia. Sole species, and therefore 



type. 

 1870. Butl., Ent. Monthl. Mag. vii. 57 : designates Eleusinia as 



type. 



31. Aganisthos.* 



1836. Boisd., Spec, gen., pi. 4 B, : Odius (Orion). Sole species, and 

 therefore type. 

 Used in same sense by subsequent authors. Probably, however, it 

 must fall before Historis (q. v.) 



32. Agapetes. 



1820. Billb., Enum. Ins. 78: Galathea, Lachesis. 



Galathea may be taken as type. See Mclanargia, Satyrus, and Arge. 



33. AGATinNA.* 



1843. White, Zool. i. 28 : 3Iargaretta. Sole species, and therefore 

 type. 

 The name is, however, preoccupied in moUusks (Raf. 18S1). 



34. Ageronia. 

 1816. Iliibn., Verz. 42: Amphinome, Arethusa (Laodamia), Feronia, 

 Chloe. 

 Subsequent usage has been in accordance with this. 



