(246 ) 



252. Motacilla alba ocularis Swinb. 



Motacilla ocu'aris Swinhoe, Ibin 18l!0. p. 55 (Amoy) ; Grant, P. Z. S. 10i>0. p, 4*57. 



8 ^? Hoihow, Aiiril 10U2, January— February I'.Milj (No. 8). 

 $ Kiungcbau, March ] i)U2 (No. 8). 



(J, 2 ? ? Lei Muimon, January 19U3 (No. 8). 

 (Migrant.) 



253. Motacilla alba leucopsis Gould. 



Motacilla hucnpsh Gould, [•m.-. Zool. Soc. Loml. 1837. p. 78 :([Qdi;i) ; Grant, P. Z. .S. 1900. 

 p. 467. 



2 (?<?, 1 ? Kinngchau, February— March 19U2 (No. 147). 

 <J No-Tai, September 1902 (No. 147). 

 S Lei Muimon, January 19U3 (No. 147). 



9 (J? Hoihow, November, December 10ii2, January, February 1903 (No. 147). 

 (Migrant.) 



254. Alauda gulgula coelivox Swinb. 



Alauda cosUnx Swinhoe, Zoulo'jU 18.'j0. p. fi724. Jl,i< 1800. p. 02, 132 (Amoy). 

 Alaudx galgula (oon Franklin 1) Grant, P. Z. S. lUOO. p. 460. 



10 cJ? Kiungcbau, February 1902, No. 13. 



? Hoihow, February, March 1902, No. 13. 



All these specimens are the same as South Chinese ones, .and their correct 

 name is Alauda gulgida coelicox, as they are not the same as the Indian 

 ^1. g. gulgula. From Formosa we have received a large series of forms with a 

 thicker bill and darker coloration. These agree with the supposed types of both 

 sala and ivattersi in the British Museum. I tliink that Swinhoe meant to call 

 Formosan examples by the name of sala, though I formerly referred the name to 

 Hainan birds, which were looked upon as the same as the Formosan ones by 

 Swinhoe. This appears to be correct, but I cannot quite understand it, as these 

 closely allied forms must be geographical representatives. 



255. Emberiza spodocephala spodocephala Tall. 

 Grant, p. Z. S. 1900. p. 400. 



9 (J? Hoihow, January— February 1903 (No. 34). 

 ? Lindon, March 1903 (No. 34). 



2 nnse.xed, Kiungcbau, March 1903 (No. 34). 

 (J Secha, March 1902 (No. 34). 



256. Emberiza aureola Pall. 



Grant, P. Z. 8. 19011. p. 400. 



3 (J cJ, 3 ? S Liudon, March 1903 (No. 173). 



1 cJ juv. No-Tai, November 1903 (No. 224). 



257. Emberiza fucata fucata Tall. 



Grant, P.Z.S. lOOO. p. 187. 



4 (?cJ, 1 ? Hoihow, February— March 1902, February l'.)ii3 (No. 19). 



1 (J Lei Muimon, January 1903 (No. 19). 



5 c?(J Liudon, March l'.io:5 (No. 19). 



2 ? ? Wnpashi, April 1904 (No. 19). 



