UCHIDA: REEVALUATION OF FISHING EFFORT 



INSHORE 



09 



OFFSHORE 



08- 



07- 



0.6- 



0.5- 



04- 



03- 



02- 



u. 1- 



a 



■V 



<-> 0- 



o 



o 



-I -0 I - 

 -0.2- 

 -0.3- 

 -0.4- 

 -0.5- 

 -0 6- 

 -0.7- 



T 1 1 r 



CLASS I 



NOT INCLUDED 

 IN REGRESSION 



-08 

 09 



0.8 



0.7 



0.6 



05 



0.4 



0.3 



0.2 



u. 1 



o 



o 



o 



o 



-" -0.1 

 -0 2 

 -0.3- 

 -0.4 

 -0.5- 

 -0 6 

 -0.7- 

 -0 8 



J L 



^NOT INCLUDED 

 IN REGRESSION 



-0.4 -0.3 -02 -0 1 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 -0.4 -0.3 -02 -0 1 1 0.2 3 04 0.5 0.6 07 0.8 09 



CLASS 2 



NOT INCLUDED 

 'IN REGRESSION 



J 1 L 



NOT INCLUDED 

 IN REGRESSION 



J I I I I I I L- 



I I 



-0 4 -0 3 -0.2 -0 1 1 2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 8 0.9 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 1 2 3 04 5 6 07 0.8 



LOG C/ET LOG C/ET 



Figure 5. — Regression of log C/DF on log C/ET for class 1 and class 2 vessels fishing inshore and oflfshore in 1965-70. 



0.9 



65 



