84 IMCHTHOFEN — NATURAL SYSTEM 



Cretaceous period by thousands of feet. This is not only true for those ranges which, 

 like the Andes and Rocky Mountains, have been intensely volcanic, but also for such 

 as show a less immediate connection with eruptive activity in the volcanic era, as is 

 the case with the Pyrenees, the Alps and the Himalaya. The elevation which suc- 

 ceeded the Cretaceous period appears to have everywhere been slow, intermittent, and 

 partly retrograde, in the Eocene epoch, while its chief phase is traceable to the Miocene 

 and subsequent epochs, by the relative altitude above the level of the sea to which 

 sediments of different ages have been raised. 



There can scarcely be any doubt that this acceleration of the changes of level, 

 and the extrusion of volcanic rocks, have had an intimate connection. But the mode 

 of. this connection has by no means been ascertained, and appears to be quite an intri- 

 cate subject. It was formerly believed that the eruptive rocks were themselves the 

 upheaving agents, their intrusion and ejection having been the mechanical means of 

 the elevation of mountain ranges. But geological observation and argumentation have 

 conclusively demonstrated that such could not be the case, and made it probable that 

 both elevation and eruption are the most conspicuous s}'mptoms of different agencies 

 which were dependent on one common cause. When that first theory had to be aban- 

 doned, another was put in its place, to the effect that the ejection of rocks must have 

 been attended by subsidence ; and, although we shall show in the following pages 

 that the rise of the crust greatly predominated in the vicinity of the eruptions, there 

 can be no doubt that subsidence was probably in all cases among their intricate effects. 

 But the cause generally ascribed to it is not at all capable of explaining it. The 

 assumption that eruption must be attended by subsidence is usually made on the ground, 

 that the removal of a certain volume of matter by ejection, from a deep-seated place, 

 would cause the formation of a vacuity, corresponding in extent to the volume 

 removed, and that consequently the overlying portions of the crust would settle down. 

 This assumption appeared to be corroborated by the observation that the region sur- 

 rounding a volcano subsides during its activity, while it rises in periods of rest. But 

 it is evident that the size of a current of lava is not proportionate to the settling of an 

 area of hundreds of square miles to the amount of several feet. If, moreover, the 

 views here advocated, regarding the cause and mode of eruptive activity, are correct, 

 that is, if the ejection of rocky matter is the effect of the increase of volume which it 

 undergoes on passing into the state of aqueous fusion, then the eruption is only the 

 discharge of the surplus matter which has no room within the space of the fissure ; no 

 vacuity could therefore be formed, and the commonly adopted cause of the subsidence 

 would not exist. There are, however, two other causes which would produce sub- 

 sidence, and have probably been acting in every case of massive and volcanic erup- 

 tions. The first of them is the contraction of the liquid mass in the conduits, by cool- 

 ing. Its amount must be considerable in proportion to the space of the fissure, but 

 small when compared with the volume of a mountain range on the surface. Its effects 

 will be local and abrupt. In the case of volcanoes, it is the probable cause of the 

 familiar phenomenon of the subsidence of the bottom of craters, and of those less fre- 

 quent cases where whole portions of the cone are suddenly engulfed. As regards 

 extensive accumulations of rocks by massive eruptions, there are certain features of 



(122) 



