FISHERY BULLETIN: VOL. 85, NO. 4 



16-20 



CAL 



PI 



CS 



PLA 



urn: 



:-OLi 



21-25 



CAL 



HA^ 



CS 



HA2 



NEM 



PI 



MISC 



-UID 

 NER 



26-30 



OLI 



NEM 



NER 



HA2 



HAi 



DET 



130 



24 



JMISC 



31-40 



NEM 



OLI 



HA2 



HAi 



CS 



MAL 



NER 



m^ 



4/211 



^ufi 



41-50 



MAL 



HA- 



NEM 



NER 



CS 



Eh 



. OLI . 



MISC 



HAi 

 OST 



51-60 



HA2 



NEM 



OLI 



MAL 



NER 



T5sr 



m. 



MISC 



Me 

 PLA 



61-80 



HA. 



Lp 



NER 



NEM 



CS 



DET 



MAL 



PLA 



Hsr: 



MISC 



^Eh 

 :-Cs 



Me 



3/333 2/260 3/388 



81-100 



NER 



CHL 



NEM 



HA-, 



OST 



PLA 



CS 



MAL 



\k 



MISC 



1-DET 

 ^T 



'100 



Me 



PLA 



La 



HA- 



GS 



NER 



NE 

 ffiT 



MISC 



-SPI 

 -FOR 

 OST 

 •AMP 

 ^Na 



14/264 



5/61 



Figure 3. — Cluster analysis of prey similarity among Leiostomus size classes for the York River estuary, 1982. 

 Prey abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Ratios at bottom of each column represent number of empty stomachs/ 

 total sample size. 



X 



< 



100 



CL 



GM 

 01 



31 40'+' 



16-20 



21 25 



r#; 



41 50 



UT 



•101 



-?r-Axis2 



erao 

 Na 



Et 



81-100 



Figure 4. — Reciprocal averaging of prey and spot size class. Prey abbreviations: 

 CH = Chlorophyta, CL = Calanoid copepods, Cs = Crangon septemspinosa, 

 Eh = Eteone heleropoda, Ei = Edotea triloba, FR = Foraminifera, GM = Gam- 

 maridae, H] = Small harpacticoid copepods, H2 = Large harpacticoid copepods, 

 La = Leucon americanus , Me = Monoculodes edwardsi , ML = Maldanidae, 

 Na = Neomysis americana , OL = Oligochaeta, OR = Orbiniidae, OT = Ostracods, 

 PL = Plant matter. 



790 



