Denson et al : Tag reporting levels for Sdaenops ocellatus in South Carolina and Georgia estuaries 



41 



also thank Charlie Bridghain and Allan Hazel, for produc- 

 tion, maintenance, and transportation offish, and Charlie 

 Wenner, for reviewing this manuscript and providing valu- 

 able insights during the project. The study was funded 

 in part by USDOC, NMFS the Saltonstall-Kennedy Pro- 

 gram gi-ant #A67FD0031 and NA77FD0062 and the state 

 of South Carolina. 



Literature cited 



Brownie, C, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, and D. S. Robson. 

 1985. Statistical inference from band recovery data: a band- 

 book. 2nd ed. U.S. Fisb and Wildl. Sei-v. Resour. Publ. 156, 

 305 p.. 

 Butler. L. 



1962. Recognition and return of trout tags by California 

 anglers. Oalif Fish Game 48:5-18. 

 Conroy, M. J., and W. W. Blandin. 



1984. Geographical and temporal differences in band report- 

 ing rates for American black ducks. J. Wildl. Manage. 

 48:23-36. 

 Henny. C. J., and K. P. Burnham. 



1976. A reward band study of mallards to estimate band 

 reporting rates. J. Wildl. Manage. 40:1-14. 

 Hoenig. J. M., N. J. Barrowman. K. H. Pollock, E. N. Brooks, W. S. 

 Hearn, and T. Polacheck. 



1998. Models for tagging data that allow for incomplete 

 mixing of newly tagged animals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 

 55:1477-1483. 

 Jenkins, W. E., M. R. Denson, and T. I. J. Smith. 



2000. Determination of angler reporting level for red drum 

 (Sciaenops ocellattif:) in a South Carolina estuary. Fish. 

 Res. 44:273-277. 

 Matlock, G. C. 



1981. Non-reporting of recaptured tagged fisb by saltwater 

 recreational boat anglers in Texas. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 

 110:90-92. 

 1986a. Estimate of the number of red drum anglers in 

 Texas. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 6:292-294. 



1986b. Estimating the direct market economic impact of 

 sport angling for red drum in Texas. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 

 6:490-493. 

 Murphy. M. D., and R. G. Taylor 



1991 Preliminary study of the effect of reward amount on 

 tag-return rate for red drum in Tampa Hay, Florida. N. 

 Am. J. Fish. Manage. 11:471-474. 

 Nichols. J. D.. R. J. Blohm. R. E. Reynolds, J. E. Mines, and 

 J. P Bladen. 



1991. Band reporting rates for mallards with reward bands 

 of different dollar values. J. Wildl. Manage. 55:119-126. 

 Pegg, M. A., J. B. Layzer, and P. W. Bettoli. 



1996. Angler exploitation of anchor-tagged saugers in the 

 lower Tennessee River N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 16:218- 

 222, 

 Pollock. K. H., J. M. Hoenig and C. M. Jones. 



1991. Estimation of fishing and natural mortality when a 

 tagging study is combined with a creel survey or port sam- 

 pling. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 12:423-434. 



Rawstron. R. R. 



1971. Non-reporting of tagged white catfish, largemouth 



bass, and bluegills by anglers at Folsum Lake, California. 



Calif Fish Game. 57:246-252. 

 Reinecke. K. J., C. W. Shaiffer. and D. Delnicki. 



1992. Band reporting rates of mallards in the Mississippi 

 alluvial valley J. Wildl. Manage. 56:526-531. 



Roberts Jr., D. E., B. V. Harpster. and G. E. Henderson. 



1978. Conditioning and induced spawning of the red drum 

 (Sciaenops osellatiis ) under varied conditions of photoperiod 

 and temperature. Proceed. World Aqua. Soc. 9:311-332. 



Ross. J. L.. T. M. Stevens, and D. S. Vaughan. 



1995. Age, growth, and reproductive biology of red drums in 

 North Carolina waters. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 124:37-54. 

 Yeager. D. M.. and M. J. Van Den Avyle. 



1979. Rates of angler exploitation of largemouth. small- 

 mouth, and spotted bass in Central Hill Reservoir. Ten- 

 nessee. Proc. Annu. Conf Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. 

 Agencies 32:449-458. 



Zale.A. v., andM.B. Bain. 



1994. Estimating tag-reporting rates with postcards as tag 

 surrogates. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14:208-211. 



