346 



Fishery Bulletin 100(2) 



ro 



1400- 



1200 



1000 



800 



600 



400 



200 





 1000 



800 - 



600 



400 • 



200 -j 



Silvery jenny 



Hardhead caHish 



- 

 1000- 



800- 



600 



400- 



200 





 1000 



800- 



600 



400 



200 



67 -55 



"! r: 



; i -88 I- 



-98 -91 -90 



— 1 1 r* 



il 



i . '1 - 



t ■f l l ii -Iv 



Sand seatrout 



III -Si Ml 



•M^ 



FFE 



EMF 



O 6 



o 

 o 



'-" 5 



Leopard searobin 



5 



1000 

 800- 

 600 

 400 

 200 



: : +32 



Blackcheek tonguetish 



Gatftopsail catfish =i 



"D 





 1000 



800 



 ' 4 



 9 



u 



^ 600 



o 



400- 

 200 



Southern l<ingfish 





 1000 1 



800 



600 



400 



200 







1000 



800 



l.uJ 



(g 41 : -68 - 



Pinfish 



■50 +^ 



Spadefish 



U ^ r. 



o-J-1 — 1-^  , ^ ^ ^ 1- 



14 17 20 

 Fall 



14 17 20 



Winter 



FFE 



EMF 



Figure 4 



Comparisons of species-specific seasonal catch and retention rates for the 10 finfish species most com- 

 monly captured in the three sizes of period bycatch reduction device iBRDi-equipped nets (black bars) 

 and control shrimp-trawl nets (hatched bars). Each vertical bar represents the total number offish 

 captured in 20 tows. Numbers over pairs of bars are the percent losses or gains in numbers of individu- 

 als captured by the BRD-equipped net versus the paired control net. FFE = Florida fisheye BRD: EMF 

 = extended mesh funnel BRD. Column 1 shows species captured principally in fall; column 2 shows 

 species captured principally in winter 



