384 



ROGER TOLLEFSON 



MR. TOLLEFSON: Yes, point No. 1. 



MR. HARRIS: Your item No. 1. 



MR. TOLLEFSON: Yes. There is a differen- 

 tial in application within Port Angeles Harbor as repre- 

 sented by the Federal report between Rayonier and Fibre- 

 board. There is also a differential between Rayonier in 

 Port Angeles and the Anacortes operations. 



I ara not saying that the other two are 

 wrong. In fact, I believe the other two are every bit 

 acceptable. I tnerely point out there is a difference in 

 approach here. 



CHAIRMAN STEIN: What is the difference? 

 I don't read it in the recomooendations. I see Fibreboard 

 and Rayonier, as I read the Federal one, and the recom- 

 mendation of the State seems to be identical. 



MR. TOLLEFSON: No, the Fibreboard and 

 Anacortes operations do not call for what in the Rayonier 

 requirements is point No. 2--no. Such reduction--anyway, 

 that one on to reduce the PBI. I think it is point No. 2 

 on the Rayonier requirements. 



CHAIRMAN STEIN: Yes, yes. That is right. 

 That is correct. 



MR. HARRIS: Thank you. 



CHAIRMAN STEIN: May I go over this? And 



