382 



1 ROGER TOLLEFSON 



2 recommendations as to removing all sludge beds and putting 



3 the contents thereof on land to be unsound. Also such 



4 removal is not feasible with the use of equipment of types 



5 available at the present time. 



6 Against the possibility of there being any 



7 misunderstanding, let me state here and now that there 



8 has been no refusal on the part of the Federal staff 



9 people to meet with us, discuss any point, or disclose 



10 to us any requested data which they have. We have been 



11 given every consideration and courtesy. However, we 



12 have not received factual answers to what we consider 



13 the pertinent questions here involved. 



14 Although we have already made the same 



15 inquiries from time to time in the past, I would like 



16 once more to ask just three simple questions which I 



17 believe sum up the entire Port Angeles controversy: 

 ig 1. What water uses or resources are 



19 presently being damaged by Rayonier in Port Angeles 



20 Harbor? 



21 2. In what manner and demonstrated by what 



22 relevant data? 



23 3. To what demonstrable extent and in 



24 what demonstrable manner would any use of these waters 



25 be benefited or increased by adoption of the recommendations 



