365 



1 JOHN DUNKAK 



2 Staff does not justify all the recommendations as set 



3 forth in the March '67 report. 



4 Thank you, gentlemen. 



6 CHAIRMAN STEIN: Do you have any comments 



5 or questions? 



Y MR. HARRIS: Mr. Dunkak, did I hear you 



g correctly say that you could not justify any waste treat- 



g ment facilities that cannot be utilized for by-products 

 recovery? I p>erhaps misunderstand. 



10 



jl MR. DUNKAK: No, Mr. Harris, I think what 



12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 



I said was that we have a heavy investment in research now, 

 and referring specifically to the spent liquor on which 

 this research is expended, we cannot go to a system that 

 will force a recovery of the liquor and still maintain a 

 research for development production. The two are not 

 jY compatible with each other. 



18 MR. HARRIS: Thank you. 



19 CHAIRMAN STEIN: I thought about saving 



20 this until the end, but I think it would be fair this way, 



21 possibly. In Mr. Benson's statement he said: 



22 "In certain cases substantial improvements 



23 of inner bay water quality may be achieved either by the 



24 removal of settleable solids or better outfall locations at 



costs much more commensurate with expected results." 



25 



