FISHERY BULLETIN: VOL. 84, NO. 3 



A. evermanni 



A. s torn i as 



CM 



2 %N 40 

 ii 20 



in 



20 



£" %W 40- 



V/2 



60- 



100 



200 



80 



60 



o %N 40 



7 20 



UJ 



o 



O ii 



Ml £ %W 





 20 

 40 

 60 

 80 



100 



200 



%N 40 

 So 20 h 



7 o 



o' 

 o, 



20 

 40 



- ii %W 60 



80 



100 



EUP 



AMP / 



t 



MYS 



i i I I I I I 1 1 1 I 







100 



80 



%N 60 



So 40 - 



20 



LLI 







°,<£ %W 40 

 60 



100 



200 



LU 



So 



^ CM 



AMP 

 OPI 



I OP 

 ~ Q V ZOA \ 



UGAD 



_1 I I I L_l I I 1 I I 







100 



200 



" %N 



o ^ 



.— n 



%W 



>- II 

 8^ 



%N 



%w 



100 



200 



100 



200 



(N 



II 



en 



o *- 

 g " 



ioor 



80 

 %N 60 



%W 



40 

 20- 

 

 20 

 40 

 60 

 80 

 100 



/ 



U GAD 



-1 1 1 L 



ro 



ii 



UJ 



O ' 

 o 



%N 



%W 







100 



200 



100 



200 



% F.O. 



% F.O. 



Figure 3.— Indices of Relative Importance of major prey items in the diets of Atheresthes evermanni and A. stomias 

 of different size groups. % F.O., percent frequency of occurrence; % N, percentage of prey number; % W, percent- 

 age of total stomach content weight; POL, pollock; EUP, Euphausiacea; CRA, Crangonidae; PAN, Pandalidae; 

 AMP, Amphipoda; PLE, Pleuronectidae; MYS, Mysidacea; STI, Stichaeidae; HIP, Hippolytidae; ZOA, Zoarcidae; 

 U. GAD, Unidentified Gadidae; COT, Cottidae; S, number of stomachs containing food; E, number of empty 

 stomachs. 



620 



