0.9 



Similarity 



0.5 01 



-0.3 



-0.5 



— r~ 



m 



m 



m 



YR 



'PTTT 



Anchoo mitchilli 

 Etropus crossofus 

 Symphurus pfogiuso 

 Dasyatis sabina 

 Pnonotus fnbulus 



Archosargus probotocephafus 



Lepisosfeus osseus 



DorosofDc pefeoense 



Mtcropogonios undulatus 

 Lewstomus xanfhurus 

 Trinectes maculofus 

 Parohchthys lethostigmo 

 Oob/osomo bosci 

 Microgobius gulosus 

 Microgobius fhafassinus 

 GobiontHus boleosoma 



Syngnafhus scovetii - 

 Lucartia parva 



L agodon rhomboides 



Brevoof fio pa fr onus 

 Mbnidia berylfina 

 Urophycis f/oridonus 

 Ictalurus cofus 



Cynosdon arenarius 

 Anus felis 



M»nticirrhus amenconus 

 Synodus foetens 



Chloroscombrus chrysurus 

 Choefodipferus faber 

 Peprilus paru 



Syngnotbus flondae 

 Eucmostomus argenfeus 

 Syngnatbus louisianae 

 CynosC'on nebulosus 

 Pnonotus scitulus 



Boirdiello chrysura 

 Sphoeroides nap^elus 

 Or thoprisfis Cbrysopfero 

 Porichthys porosissimus 



Eucmostomus gula 

 Opistbonerria oglmum 



Anchoa hepse lus 



Monocanfhus hispidus 



Poiydactyius octonemus 



Bagre mannus 



Figure 43. Temporal associations of fishes taken in Apalachicola 

 estuary from March 1972 to February 1976. Only top 45 species in 

 terms of total numbers of individuals are shown. Clusters represent 

 species that occur together from one year to the next (Livingston et 

 al. 1978). 



98 



