494 



Fishery Bulletin 94(3). 1996 



1(2] 



Q Ocean -type n = 114 



@ Stream type n = 404 



r Standard deviation 



* Signiticant difference 



* 

 (47) 



) (26) 2 (91 



"_< 361 5(3) 



- 1 — 

 Sep 



May 



— I — 

 Sep 



-I — 

 Feb 



Age 



'■' i , 



Age - 1 



Age -2 



Figure 6 



Growth rates of ocean- and stream-type chinook salmon, Oncorhyn- 

 chus tshawytseha, by ocean age and season in marine waters of south- 

 eastern Alaska, 1986-87. Mean growth rates are based on coded-wire— 

 tag recoveries shown in parentheses. Significant differences (P<0.05) 

 in growth rates between ocean- and stream-type chinook salmon were 

 denoted by an asterisk. 



Table 7 



Migration rate and direction of coded-wire-tagged ocean- and stream-type chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytseha, recov- 

 ered in inside and outside marine waters of the northern, central, and southern regions of southeastern Alaska in February, May, 

 and September 1986-87. Stock group designations: AK = Southeastern Alaska, BC = British Columbia, and WO = Washington or 

 Oregon, n = number offish. 



Average migration 



Migration direction 



N NE E SE S SW W NW 



1 1 



1 1—11 — 



2 33 



— — — — 32 



6 — 16 



25 



3 1 15 17 38 14 24 15 



9 4 19 37 70 15 17 33 



19 1 1 1 2 3 13 



14 

 1 3 



10 13 



4 

 _ ______ 3 



