(62) 



24. M. remulia (Cramer), Pap. /•>. III. t. 237. f. V. G (ITk^). 

 Nnraerons examiiles. 



25. M. sirius (Fabricins), I.e. 



Satyrm manipa Boisd., Vo>/. AstroL, Lep. p. 150 (1832). 



A good series of this species, includiag two /finales, which are mnch larger 

 and brighter in colour than the males, and in which the ocelli are also laro^er 

 and mnch more distinct. 



Subfamily ELYMNIINAE Herr.-Schiiff. 

 Genus ELYMNIAS Hiibner. 

 26. E. viminalis Wallace, Trans. Enf. Soc. Lond. p. 328 (180!t). 

 The specimens which I refer to the species named as above by Mr. Wallace 

 agree qnite well with his description, if based upon a female type. Tlie luteous 

 band on the margins of the wings, of which he speaks in loc. c/'t., are conspicuous 

 features in that se.x, but not so mnch so in the case of the male, which is 

 prevalently mnch darker than the female. The maculation on the underside of 

 the wings is much less than in the case of E. titelliu (Cramer), and is almost 

 wholly restricted in the case of the males to the spots at the ends of the cell 

 on both wings, and the curved discal series of spots, which succeed these. 

 There are a number of males and %ex^X2\ females in the collection. 



Subfamily MORPHINAE Butler. 

 Genus TENARIS Hubner. 

 27. T. urania (Linnaeus), Mm. Lud. Ulr. p. 225 (1764). 

 There are a few jioor males and one torn female belonging to this species. 



28. T. buruensis Forbes, A NaUmilist's Wanderings in the Eastern 

 Archipelago p. 411 (1883). 



There are a number of this species, mostly females, in the collection. The 

 description given by Forbes applies to the female, and apparently was founded 

 upon a specimen of that sex. The males have narrow wings, prevalently light 

 fawn-colonr. 



Subfamily NYMPHALINAE Bates. 



Genus CETHOSIA Fabricins. 



29. C. cydippe (Linnaeus), Syst. Nat. I. 2. p. 776 (1767). 



Papilio ino Cramer, Pap. Ex. I. t. 62. f. A. B (1779). 



Apparently not very common. The specimens show a tendency to melanism, 

 and agree in this more nearly with the figure given by Cramer than with that 

 given by Clerck. 



