( 130 ) 



2 d Tawa3'a, Celebes (Doherty coll.)- 



3 <S juv. Dorey (Doherty coll.). 



1 ? Andai (from Bmijn's hunters). 

 1 ? Ron Island (Doherty coll.). 

 1 c? jnv. Kafn (from Bruijn's hunters). 

 1 t?, 1 j«v., 1 ? Kai><anr (Doherty coll.). 



1 ? (?) Djamma. 



2 c?, 1 ¥ Takar (Doherty coll.). 



1 S juv. Dobbo, Aru Islands (Captain C. Webster coll.). 



1 c?, 1 ¥ Jobi Island (Doherty coll.). 



1 (? ad. Fergnsson Island (A. S. Meek coll.). 



1 ¥ ad. Mioko (T. H. Kleiuschmidt coll.). 



1 (? ad. New Britain (Kubary coll.). 



1 S ad. Blanche Bay, New Britain. 



1 ¥ ad. Duke of York Island (Kleiuschmidt coll.). 



1 ¥ ad, New Ireland. 



2 S New Hanover (Cajitain C. Webster coU.). 



1 ?, 2 c? jnv. Mysol (Kuhn coll.). 



3 (? ad. Toeal, Key Islands (Kiihn & Webster coll.). 



2 <J ad. Brown River (Weiske coll.). 



1 c? ad. Goodenough Island (Meek coll.). 



If Chalcophaps mortoni is separable at all, it is only slightly larger. We have 

 one $ ad. collected by Woodford on Guadalcanar whose wing measurement is 

 153 mm., while the average of the true Ch. stepkani is 145 mm. W^e have, 

 however, specimens reaching 149, 150, and 151 mm., so that we think it possible 

 that the Solomon form will not be separable. 



mi. Henicophaps albifrons G. R. Gray. 



Inhabits New Guinea, tlie Western Papuan, and Am Islands. AVe have the 

 following IT specimens : — 



2 ad., 3 juv. without labels, Itut evidently from North-Western New Guinea, 

 purchased from feather-dealers. 



1 ad. without locality, purchased from Gerrard, probably from British New 

 Guinea (? Goldie coll.). 



1 (J ad. Waigiu (from Bruijn's hunters). 



2 3 Sogere, Owen Stanley Mountains 1200 and 2000 ft. (H. 0. Forbes coll.). 

 2 Brown River, British New Guinea (E. Weiske coll.). 



1 Mt. Cameron, British New Guinea (A. S. Anthony coll.). 



1 ? Fly River (D'Albertis coll.). 



2 ? Milne Bay (A. S. Meek coll.). 



1 c? Wokan, Aru Islands (Hch. Kiihn coll.). 



1 ¥ Kobroor, Aru Islands ("Hch. Kiihn coll.). 



The last two specimens from Aru are darker on the hiudueck and underside, 

 but almost matched by specimens from South-East New Guinea, and not quite like 

 each other. Should further material prove the possibility of separating the Aru 

 birds from those of New Guinea, then the former would have to be culled llcnicophapa 

 albifrons achlegeli Rosenb. 



