ILLINOIS 



171 



Includes a list of some three hundred species of the larger 

 fungi, collected in the State. 



Ellis & Martin. Some new Species of Sphaeriaceous Fungi. 

 Am. Nat. 16: 809, 810. 1882. 



Includes descriptions of four Florida species. 



New Species of North American Fungi. Am. Nat. 16: 



1001-1004. 1882; 18: 1147, 1148, 1264. 1884; 19: 76, ']']. 

 1885. 



Descriptions of forty-one species, mostly from Florida. 



New Florida Fungi. Am. Nat. 17 : 1283-1285. 1883; 



18: 69, 70, 188-190. 1884. 



Descriptions of twenty-two species. 



New Florida Fungi. Jour. Mycol. i: 97-101. 1885. 



Descriptions of fifteen species, partly from Florida. 



Georgia. 



Ravenel collected in the vicinity of Augusta and some of these 

 collections appear in his exsiccati ; aside from this we know of no 

 field work having been done in the state ; we note a single paper: 



Cooke. North American Fungi. Grevillea, n: 106-111. 

 1883. 



Describes twenty-seven species partly from Georgia. 



Idaho. 



So far as we know, nothing has been done in this state toward 

 making known its fungus flora. 



Illinois. 



Except among the parasitic forms, comparatively little has been 

 done in this central state. A somewhat thorough exploration for 

 the parasitic forms was organized during the eighties by the State 

 Laboratory of Natural History and extensive collections were 

 made mainly by A. B. Seymour. Under the direction of Pro- 

 fessor Burrill, the Uredinales were monographed by Seymour 

 and the Erysibaceae by Earle ; other parts were prepared but 

 unfortunately have never been published, since those that did 

 appear have been exceedingly useful far beyond the state. Pro- 

 fessor Earle also made collections in the southern part of the 

 state, and other students and assistants of Professor Burrill, M. B. 



