igio GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 



Ellis & Kellerman. New Species of North American Fungi. 

 Am. Xat. 17: 1 1 64-1 166. 1883. 



Describes fourteen species chiefly from Ohio. 



James. Catalogue of the Flowering Plants, Ferns and Fungi 

 growing in the Vicinity of Cincinnati. Jour. Cincinnati Soc. 

 Nat. Hist. 2: 42-68. 1879. (Separate, pp. 27.) 



List of 319 fungi from Lea's earlier catalogue. 



Kellerman & Werner. Catalogue of Ohio Plants. Geology of 

 Ohio, 7-': 56-406. 1895. 



Includes a list of some 1080 species known from the state. 

 Includes also a bibliography of Ohio botany. 



Lea. Catalogue of Plants, native and naturalized, collected 

 in the Mcinity of Cincinnati During the Years 1 834-1 844. Pp. 

 17. Philadelphia, 1849. 



List of 319 species of fungi with descriptions of fifty-three new 

 species by Berkeley. 



Morgan. The Mycologic Flora of the Miami Valley. O. 

 Jour. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist. 6; 54-81. PL 2, j ; 97-117 

 173-199. PL 8, g. 1883; —7: 5-10. PL I. 1884: —8 

 91-11 1. Z'/. 7; 168-174. 1885;9:1-8. 18S6; — 10: 7-18 

 188-202. 1887 ;— II : 86-95. 1S88. 



Descriptions of the hymenomycetous fungi of the region. 



The Myxomycetes of the Miami A'alley. Ohio Jour. 



Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist. 15: 127-143. PL j. 1893; 16: 

 13-36. PL I. 1893; 127-156. PL II, 12. 1894; 19: 1-44. 

 PL 1-3. 1896. 



Selby. The Ohio Erysipheae. Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. 

 (Tech. Ser.), i : 213-224. 1S93. 



Stevens. Parasitic Fungi on Ohio Weeds. Jour. Columbus 

 Hort. Soc. II: 120-126. 1896. (Separate, pp. 1-7.) 



Oklahoma. 



Scarcely anything is known of the fungi of this territory, which 

 is doubtless closely allied to that of the adjoining state of Kansas, 

 which is known to be rich particularly in parasitic species. 



Oregon. 



Various incidental collections have been made in this state by 

 W. M. Carpenter, W. C. Cusick and Professor F. E. Lloyd, most 



