tsii nauchno-tekhnicheskikh razrabotok , p. 125. 



71. See Taksir, Sushchnost' i formy soyedineniya 

 nauki s proizvodstvom pri sotsializme (Moscow: Vys- 

 shaya Shkola, 1974), pp. 92-104; V. Pavlyuchenko , "Ot 

 stola konstruktura do zavodskogo konveiera," Pravda, 

 June 13, 1971 and his Ekonomicheskiye problemy uprav- 

 leniya nauchno-tekhnicheskim- progressom (Moscow: Nau- 

 ka, 1973), pp. 202-213; Shteinbok, op. cit. , pp. 76- 

 85; Kanygin, Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy potentsial , pp. 

 237-241. 



72. See Shteinbok, op. cit ., pp. 79-80 and L. Davy- 

 dov and R. Shteinbok, "Formy organizatsii vnedreniya 

 novoy tekhniki," Voprosy ekonomiki , 9 (1977), p. 134. 



73. See Taksir, Sushchnost* i formy soyedineniya 

 nauki s proizvodstvom pri sotsializme , pp. 92-104 and 

 his Nauchno-proizvodstvennyye ob"yedineniya , pp. 24- 

 25. 



74. See the excellent article by John Lowenhardt, 

 "The Tale of the Torch: Scientists-Entrepreneurs in 

 the Soviet Union," Survey , XX, 4 (93) (Autumn 1974), 

 pp. 113-121. 



75. Ibid. , pp. 117-118. 



76. K. Taksir and M. Krasnokutskiy, "Formy organi- 

 zatsii vnedreniya novoy tekhniki," Voprosy ekonomiki , 

 1 (1977), p. 50; V. Pokrovskiy, "Novaya tekhnika: 

 Dorogi i porogi," Ekonomicheskaya gazeta, 10 (March 

 10, 1976), p. 10. 



77. Taksir and Krasnokutskiy, op. cit. , p. 50. 



78. Shteinbok, "Komu vnedryat' novuyu tekhniku," 

 p. 80. 



79. K. I. Taksir, Integratsiya nauki i proizvodstva 

 pri sotsializme (Moscow: Znaniye, 1975), pp. 47-48. 



80. Ekonomika i organizatsiya promyshlennogo pro- 



248 



