16. Volkov, Planovoye upravleniye nauchno-tekhni- 

 cheskim progressom , pp. 17, 19. Emphasis added. 



17. Dobrov, "Science Policy and Assessment in the 

 Soviet Union," p. 308. 



18. L. Blyakhman commented on the increasing number 

 of scientists in Neva , 1 (January 1973), pp. 173-181. 

 See also K. L. Gorfan, N. I. Komkov, and L. E. Minde- 

 li, Planirovaniye i upravleniye nauchnymi issledovan- 

 iyami (Moscow: Nauka, 1971), p. 8. For the budgetary 

 projections, see E. Kosov, "Ekonomicheskiye problemy 

 upravleniya nauchno-tekhnicheskim progressom," Ekono- 

 micheskiye nauki , 7 (1971), p. 51. 



19. See S. Mikulinskiy, "Problema nauchnykh kadrov 

 v usloviyakh nauchno-tekhnicheskoy revolyutsii," Kom- 

 munist, 5 (1973), pp. 76-88; Zavlin et al, Trud v 

 sfere nauki (Moscow, 1973), pp. 123-124. 



20. G. N. Volkov, Sotsiologiya nauki: Sotsiologi- 

 cheskiye ocherki nauchno-tekhnicheskoy deyatel'nosti 

 (Moscow: Politizdat, 1968), p. 216. 



21. Dobrov, "Science Policy and Assessment in the 

 Soviet Union," p. 309. 



22. XXIV S"yezd KPSS, II, p. 19. 



23. XXV S"yezd KPSS , I, p. 67. 



24. Pravda , February 19, 1977. 



25. Statement by E. I. Sklyarov of the State Com- 

 mittee for Science and Technology as reported by Loren 

 Graham in his "The Place of the Academy of Sciences 

 System in the Overall Organization of Soviet Science," 

 in Thomas and Kruse-Vaucienne, op. cit . , p. 55. 



26. See M. A. Vilenskiy, "Sotsial'no-ekonomiches- 

 kaya ef fektivnost' nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa," 

 in Gatovskiy, Ekonomicheskiye problemy nauchno-tekh- 

 nicheskoy revolyutsii pri sotsializme , pp. 138-146; 



291 



