1946 



Iniernational Information, Education, and Cultural Relations: Recommendations 

 for the Future. Washington, Georgetown University, Center for Strategic and 

 International Studies, 1975. 85 p. 

 Janssen, Jules J. A. "Microprojects: Transfer of Technology by Mail." Inter- 

 national Development Review/ Focus, v. 17, no. 2, 1975: 9-12. 



"The objective of a microproject is to ofiFer, through correspondence, 

 socially as well as technically sound advice for solving LDC technical prob- 

 lems. Certain measures have been identified which serve to alleviate the 

 difficulties inherent in the transfer of technology by mail." 

 Joelson, Mark R. "International Technology Transfers and the United States 

 Antitrust Laws." Journal of International Law & Economics, v. 8, June 1973: 

 85-112. 



Covers the drafting of an international technology agreement with respect 

 to territorial restrictions, price restrictions, field of use restrictions, tying 

 arrangements, package licensing, royalty formulas, grantbacks, and cross- 

 licenses and patent pooling. 

 Kay, David. "International Transfer of Marine Technology : the Transfer Process 

 and International Organizations." Ocean Development and International Law 

 Journal, v. 2, winter 1974: 351-377. 



"This article is concerned with describing and evaluating the approaches 

 by international organizations in their efforts to facilitate the transfer of 

 technology." 

 Knezo, Genevieve J. International Technology Transfer: A Selected Bibliography. 

 In U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics. Subcom- 

 mittee on International Cooperation in Science and Space. International Science 

 and Technology Transfer Act of 1974- Hearings, 93d Cong. 2d sess. May 1974. 

 Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Ofif., 1974. pp. 161-166. 

 Kohler, B.M., A.H. Rubenstein, and C.F. Doubbs. "A Behavioral Study of 

 International Technology Transfer Between the United States and West 

 Germany." Research Policy, v. 2, Oct. 1973: 160-184. 

 Laszlo, Ervin, "World System Research and Information Bureau: A Proposal." 

 International Association, no. 1, Jan. 1974: 34-38. ■ 



This is a proposal for the creation of an international information gathering, 

 evaluating and disseminating agency, functioning in the supranational 

 interests of mankind. 

 McLin, Jon. "Technology and Transatlantic Relations; Part I: Export Controls 

 and Conditions of Competition." [Hanover, N.H., American Universities Field 

 Staff] 1970. 8 p. (American Universities Field Staff. Field staff reports. West 

 Europe series, v. 5^ no. 7 [General].) 

 "Measuring the Impact of Academic Exchange." FAR Horizons, v. VII, no. 2, 

 Spring 1974: 4-6. 



Discusses the second phase of a two phase study by the International 

 Committee for the Study of Educational Exchange. The topics assessed 

 are: the long-term effects of international exchange and ways to cope with 

 problems that confront exchangee. 

 Nau, Henry R. Technology Transfer, U.S. Foreign Policy and the International 

 System. Paper prepared for delivery at the 1975 Annual Meeting of the American 

 Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 1975. 40 p. plus bibliog- 

 raphy. (Research is part of the project on "Technology Transfer and U.S. 

 Foreign PoUcy," funded by the NSF Grant ST-44205.) 



"In the postwar period, the outflow of U.S. technology to foreign countries 

 has been dealt with in three separate and largely unrelated policy contexts : 

 (1) strategic-military emphasizing export controls on technology to communist 

 countries (2) foreign assistance involving the use of U.S. technology to obtain 

 political-diplomatic benefits and (3) the multinational company reflecting the 

 transfer of technology within an integrated economic structure cutting across 

 national boundaries. This paper assesses and compares the motivations, 

 mechanisms, and effects of technology transfer in these separate contexts and 

 •seeks to identify overall patterns affecting the use of American technology in 

 foreign affairs. The patterns identified include: (1) While strategic-military 

 and foreign policy motivations have dominated the use and evaluation of 

 technology transfer in the past, economic and social criteria have become 

 more important today, raising difficult issues concerning the pricing of tech- 

 nology in international economic exchanges. (2) While high-level government 

 .agencies have set the framework for foreign policy-related technology initia- 

 tives in the past and technical agencies or private industry have implemented 



