1967 



"Politics for science and technology in Great Britain : postwar development 

 and reassessment," Norman J. Vig; "Science, technology and French inde- 

 pendence," Robet G. Gilpin Jr.; "The Dynamics of Japanese science policy," 

 T. Dixon Long; "Science and technology policy is in Sweden," Ingemar 

 N. H. Dorfer; and "United States gcience policy in transition," Jurgen 

 Schmandt. 

 Segal, Gerald. "Euroscience : Dahrendorf's Adagio." New Scientist, August 2, 

 1973: 267-268. 



Background on Ralf Dahrendorf's appointment as EEC Commissioner 

 for research, science and education and how it has led to a rethinking of the 

 hardline Spinelli policies for a Community science and technology policy. 

 Tilton, John E. International Diffusion of Technology: the Case of Semiconductors. 

 Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution, 1972. 225 p. 



"A few advanced countries, in particular the United States, create a large 



share of the world's new technology. From these innovation centers, new 



products and processes are disseminated throughout the world. This study 



investigates the international diffusion of transistor, integrated circuit, and 



other semiconductor technology in five countries — the United States, Britain^ 



France, Germany, and Japan." 



TJ.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. To Restore Harmony: 



New Efforts on Transatlantic Cooperation, Washington, 1973. Washington, 



U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1973. 75 p. 



(At head of title: 93rd Cong. 1st sess. House Committee Print.) 

 Among the issues treated are energy, international trade in agricultural 

 commodities, and multinational corporations. 

 U.S. Congress. Joint Economic Committee. Subcommittee on Economic Growth. 

 Technology, Economic Growth, and International Competitiveness. A report 

 prepared by Robert Gilpin. July 9, 1975. 94th Cong., 1st sess. Washington, 

 U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1975. 87 p. (Joint Committee Print.) 



"Professor Gilpin examines the thesis that the United States has lagged 

 in recent years in the development and application of new civilian technology 

 because, among other things, of a faulty conception of the innovative process 

 by Federal policymakers, an inappropriate allocation of Federal R and D 

 funds, and a lack of adequate communication and coordination between 

 research scientists and those in charge of industrial applications. The ex- 

 periences of other industrial countries also are brought to bear on the issue." 

 U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences. Meeting- 

 with Assembly of Western European Union Committee on Scientific, Technological, 

 and Aerospace Questions. Hearing, 94th Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 18 and 20, 1975. 

 Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1975. 44 p. 



International cooperation in astronautics/Space policy — [U.S.]/Space 

 policy — [Western Europe]. 

 U.S. European Economic Cooperation in Military and Civil Technology. 1974- 

 National Technical Information Service, Department of Commerce. AD 

 A009049. 



The study was prepared in late summer 1974 by EX-IM TECH, Inc. for 

 the Department of State, with funding from several military research agencies. 

 "It assessed the costs in military and economic terms of duplication and 

 lack of standardization in NATO's miUtary procedure, analyzed the ob- 

 stacles to eliminating these costs, and set forth a comprehensive plan 

 to remedy the situation. The solution to the problem, [the author concludedT 

 lies in estabUshing a Common Defense Market wherein every defense 

 dollar Europe spends in the United States is matched over the long run 

 with a dollar spent in Europe, and where there is an agency for the European 

 NATO countries collectively to carry out nondupUcative bilateral defense 

 industry programs with the United States." 

 U.S. General Accounting Office. Benefits and Drawbacks of U.S. Participation in 

 Military Cooperative Research and Development Programs with Allied Countries, 

 Department of Defense; report to the Congress by the Comptroller General 

 of the United States. [Washington] 1974. 42 p. "B-167034, June 4, 1974" 

 Walsh, John. "In a Hard Year in Brussels, Things Look Up for Science." Science, 

 V. 184, May 31, 1974: 962-967. 



"One sector in which the [EEC] seems to be going forward is science and 

 technology. This is perhaps surprising since the Community's science pro- 

 gram has for years been stymied by the problems of Euratom, the Com- 

 munity's atomic energy organization. If there was a milestone marking a 

 change in the fortunes of science and technology, it was the first Community 



