1927 



APPENDIX V: COORDINATION IN COMPLEX SETTINGS 



The Coordination of Complexity in South Asia by Lloyd I. Rudolph^ 

 Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, Universitj' of Chicago, et al. 



APPENDIX W: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: FOREIGN POLICY 



1. Ethical Considerations and Foreign Policy by Donald F. McHenrj', with 

 the assistance of Fred K. Kirfchstein. 



2. Ethical Considerations and National Securitv Policj'^ by Francis X. 

 Winters, S.J. 



APPENDIX X: THREE INTRODUCTORY RESEARCH GUIDELINES 



1. The Commission's Studies Program by Peter L. Szanton. 



2. Alternative Organizational Models for the Conduct of Foreign Policy 

 by William I. Bacchus and R. Roger Majak. 



3. Problems in the Conduct of United States Foreign Policy : A Compilation 

 of Recent Critiques by J. Daniel O'Flaherty. 



Crawford, Elisabeth T. and Albert D. Biderman, eds. Social Scienlists and Inicr- 

 national Affairs: A Case For A Sociology of Social Science. New York, John' 

 Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1969. 333 p. 



"This book examines the relationship between social scientists and the 

 activities of the U.S. Government in the international ficki since the begin- 

 ning of World War II. The plan for this volume of reprinted articles, com- 

 mented on by the editors and supplemented' by an extensive bibliograph}-, 

 was developed in the course of a research i)roject supported by the Behavioral 

 Sciences Division of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research on the use of 

 social science knowledge in international and military affairs." The writings 

 of outstanding social scientists are representecj. Topics covered include: 

 "perspectives on the social roles" of social scientists; the social organization 

 of policy-oriented social science; the relationships between social science re- 

 search and policy needs, and the functions of policy-oriented social science. 

 Excellent annotated bibliographies treating many of the topics discu.ssed are 

 included. Also appended are materials on "the organization of policy-oriented 

 social science" in the government, governmental "decisionmaking structures 

 and use of social science research," and "the substance of social science 

 knowledge and policy concerns in international and military affairs." 

 DuBridge, Lee A. "Pohcy and the Scientists." Foreign Affairs, v. 41, no. 3, Apr. 

 1963: 571-588. 



Assessment of the contributions and limitations of scientists and engineers 

 in government and those called upon for consultation in particular policy 

 areas. In-depth coverage of the Office of Scientific Research and Development^ 

 the Atomic Energy Commission, the President's Science Advisory Committee, 

 the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space 

 Administration; cm-sory coverage of other agencies and departments. Illus- 

 trates the frequent disagreement among scientists and the difficulty of 

 characterizing the "rightness" or "wrongness" of scientific advice received 

 by the government. Mr. DuBridge concludes: "One who has had full access 

 to the record cannot help but be proud of the way in which the Nation's best 

 scientists, when brought intc) responsible posts in public affairs, have carried 

 out their tasks conscientiously, selflessly, intelligently — and often with great 

 brilliance and breadth of vision." 

 Etheredge, Lloyd S. "Personality & Foreign Policy: Bullies in the State Depart- 

 ment." Psychology Today, v. 8, March 1975: 37-40, 42. 



"The man to watch out for is mature, sophisticated, proud of himself, 



ambitious, and itching for power. If he's low in his trust of others, he projects 



his private world on ambiguous international situations. The first good study 



on the willingness to wage war — or dodge it — among miUtary and State 



Department professionals. 



"Federal Funding of Foreign Affairs Research." FAR Horizons, v. 7, no. 1, 



Winter 1974: 5-8. (Newsletters of the secretaries committee, Subcommittee on 



Foreign Affairs Research.) 



Survey and analysis of foreign affairs research funding patterns in the 

 U.S. Government. 



