CM 



W analysis of the current status of the wetlands and the nature of the 



"Z. coverage. The authors' recommendations for action with respect to 



_j designating the wetlands as Natural Landmarks, based upon the infor- 



Lu mation they have been able to assemble, conclude each state summary. 



> An alphabetical list of the specific areas, together with the codes 



^ designating the wetland types found therein, precedes the individual 



< wetland descriptions. Wetlands that are already Registered Natural 



Z Landmarks and/or those that should be given top priority for designa- 



tion are marked with an asterisk. The limitations of this type of survey 

 should be recognized. We are aware that the data presented for the 

 various states do not represent uniform coverage of the significant wet- 

 lands. Excellent data were available from certain states, whereas poor 

 responses resulted in minimal information from others. 



Literature Cited 



Butcher, D. 1963. Exploring our National Wildlife Refuges. Houghton 



Mifflin, Boston. 340 p. 

 Federal Committee on Research Natural Areas. 1968. A directory 



of Research Natural Areas on federal lands of the U.S.A., U.S. 



Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. p. 129. 

 The Nature Conservancy News, 21 (2):3-4 1 . 1970. 



