KODENTIA. 181 



M. 



Le.igth of superior'molar series 0145 



Length of molars II ami III together 0065 



Length of molars IV and V together 0070 



Transverse diameter of M. II 0042 



Transverse diameter of M. V 0035 



Width at eyes 0165 



AVidth behind eyes 0100 



Length of mandibular ramus from incisor to condyle 0400 



Length of diastema 0060 



Length of molar series 0135 



Dejith of ramus at second molar 0100 



Depth of ramus at coronoid process 0310 



Depth of ramus at condyle 0235 



Length of humerus (Nos. 5 or 6) 0600 



_ . , ,. ^ „, ( anteroposterior of head 008 



Proximal diameter oi humerus/ ..,,,,.. „, , 



( transverse, with tuberosities Oia 



Distal, with humerus 016 



Width of distal condyles of humerus Oil 



„. ^, , „ ,. (vertical 006 



Diameter of head of radius < . „„, 



I transverse 007 



Depth of radius (f minus epiphysis) 048 



Depth of ulna at coronoid 006 



Anteroposterior diameter of head of femur 009 



Transverse diameter at little trochanter ■ 0135 



Transverse diameter below little trochanter 009 



Transverse diameter at distal end 016 



Vertical diameter at distal end (greatest) 015 



Diameter shaft of tibia at distal two-fifths of length 006 



„ ,. , , ^ ., . (anteroposterior 010 



Diameter at distal end ol tibia < , „,„ 



( transverse 010 



„. „ ,, „ . , (anteroposterior 008 



Diameter of trochlea of astragalus ; , „„_ 



° ( transverse 007 



Length of head of astragalus 005 



Angle of axis of head with trochlea 9° 



„. ^ „ • 1 r (vortical 0045 



Diameters oi navicular race < ^ „„^„ 



( transverse 0066 



Length of a metatarsal 029 



Length of ilium to acetabulum 0785 



at crest 0150 



I at acetabulum 0105 



Vertical diameter of acetabulum 0105 



Length of ischium 0128 



,„.,,, .. ,. ( at acetabulum 0075 



Widths of ischium < ,,.,,. , „,^n 



I at distal border 0150 



From the above measurements the following comparisons with the Sciu- 

 rus niger may be made : The pelvis is longer as compared with the bones 

 of the fore leg. The humerus is longer as compared with the length of the 

 ulna and radius. The species exceeds the 8. niger in size, one-fourth linear. 



