B-31 



Rather than having, let's say, a 150 nation negotiation which 

 is going to involve the political decisions on how to run a 

 resource management regime, it might be possible to do some- 

 thing that in my view would be more rational, which would be 

 to build the kind of institutional relationships which would, 

 hopefully, allow for the so-called international community 

 interests to be meshed with so-called conservation interests, 

 into something of the benefit of all. But that might be kind 

 of panglossian. 



MR. HARGROVE: Lots of luck. 



MR. JAMES BARNES: Yes — 



CHAIRMAN BREWSTER: It is an obvious problem, an obvious 

 danger, I don't know how it will eventually come out. 



At this juncture, I would like to recess the meeting for 

 fifteen minutes. 



We will reconvene at 4:10. 



(Proceedings were recessed briefly, 

 after which they resumed as follows:) 



CHAIRMAN BREWSTER: Can we reconvene? Is there any further 

 discussion? 



MR. KNIGHT: Oh, I guess I can start off. I just have 

 a question of someone which might be conceived of as fairly 

 important, I think. I would like to know what your thought is, 

 or if you have thought about possible public representation 

 on the delegation to Canberra. 



I know that — I think Pat went to the Ninth Meeting — 



CHAIRMAN BREWSTER: Yes. 



MR. KNIGHT: But I was wondering if you were thinking of 

 having more than one. 



CHAIRMAN BREWSTER: Yes, I have thought about it. 



I do intend to have more than one and I intend also to a- 

 gain invite Congressional representation. 



My thoughts and recommendations are subject to confir- 

 mation — "confirmation" isn't the right word -- the responsi- 

 bility for final decision rests with another bureau, but I 



