Millet — J New Chamois from the Apennines. \X\ 



fxsula it is 32.] and :'>•_'..">. The ratios of mandibular toothrow to length 

 of mandible in the same specimens arc: R. rupicapra, •".7. 7 and 37.9; /.'. 

 f.i siila, lii. I and H.3. In the incisiform teeth t lie same difference in size is 

 evident cm comparison though nol easy to express by definite measure- 

 ments. 



In color Rupicapra fsesula closely agrees with R. rupicapra. Both 

 specimens are in the short summer coat in which R. ornata is figured by 

 Neumann. Neither shows the slightest tendency, as in ornata and pyren- 

 aica, for the pale throat area to extend downward on the neck. 



