2«^(j Transactions. 



I 



3. Lepas fascicularis Ellis and Solander. 



New Brighton, New Zealand; Dr. Dendy, 1895. Kermadec Islands; 

 Oliver. 19081 *The Nuggets, Otago; and North Cape, Auckland. 



4. Lepas pectinata Darwin. 



General type: Chatham Islands; Dr. Dendy, 1901. Var. (a) Darwin: 

 Kermadec Islands ; Oliver, 1908. *North Island, New Zealand (dry). 



5. Lepas denticulata Gravel. 



Kermadec Islands; Captain Bollons, 1907. 



6. Pollicipes sertus Darwin. 



Kaikoura, New Zealand, 1898 ; Port Pegasus. Stewart Island, 1907 ; 

 Oamaru, 1914. 



7. Pollicipes spinosus Quoy and Gaimard. 



Kaikoura, New Zealand, 1898 ; Taylor's Mistake Bav, Lvttelton, New 

 Zealand: *Wellington ; F. W. Hutton (dry). 



8. Pollicipes darwini Hutton. 



*Dunedin A. Montgomery (type), (dry). *St. Clair. Dunedin ; F. W. 

 Hutton. Port Pegasus, Stewart Island, 1907 ; Kaikoura. Oamaru. Dunedin, 

 1914. 



9. Scalpellum (Smilium) spinosum Annandale. 



*Farewell Spit, Nelson, Annandale. ' Nora Niven " Expedition, 

 Station 5, 1907. 



10. Scalpellum villosum Leach. 



P 



edin. 



Port Robinson, Marlborough, 1910; Oamaru, 1914: *St. Clair. Dun- 



The above list is as complete as I can make it, and contains all that 

 can be considered absolutely reliable material as regards identity and locality 

 so far collected. Except in the three cases noted, the specimens are all well- 

 preserved spirit ones, and located in the Otago University Museum, Dunedin, 

 or in the Biological Laboratory, Canterbury College, Christchurch. I have 

 carefully dissected several specimens of each of the species given, and 

 examined all the main points of identification, including the mouth parts, 

 and have repeated my work at intervals of several months. I am reason- 

 ably certain, therefore, that the specimens handled should be referred to 

 these species as at present constituted, and described by Darwin (1851) 

 and Gruvel (1905). 



There is a huge amount of material which should be recorded here, 

 but which must be kept out of the reliable list for this region. Thus, I 

 have examined well-preserved spirit specimens belonging to the following 

 species, but have not included them in the list given above, as the locality 

 is doubtful and it is not certain that they are indigenous to the New 

 Zealand region :• — 



