82 



552. ptilodonta Grt. Arizona. 



Gen. Pachypolia Ort. 1874. 

 Type: P. atriconiis. 



553. atricornis Grt. Illinois. 



Gen. Platypolia Grt. 1895. 

 Type: P. acutissinia. 



554. acutissinia Grt. Canada: Nova Scotia. 



555. medialis Grt. Canada; Middle States. 

 55fi. capax G. & R. Canada to Colorado. 



557. speciosa Morr. „Massachusetts". 



558. confragosa Morr. „Canada". 



559. illocata Wlk. Canada to Colorado. 



Stigmata Grote. 



560. illepida Grt.*) New Mexico; Nevada; Colorado. 



Gen. Andropolia Grt. 1895. 

 Type: A. theodori. 

 5(il. theodori Grt. Colorado; Nevada; California. 



var. epichysis Grt. 



562. aedon Grt. Colorado; Nevada; Washington. 



563. olorina Grt. California; Colorado. 



Gen. Polia Hübn. Tent. 1806. 

 Type: V. flavicincta. 

 = Xanthopastis Hb. Verz. excl. timais. 



564. pallifera Grt. Illinois. 



565. contacta Wlk. Hudsons Bay; Northern N. Y. 



aspera Morr. 

 diffusilis Harv. 



566. cristifera Wlk.**) „Hudsou's Bay Territory". 



567. pulverulenta Sm, Colorado. 



Gen. Fishia Grt. 1877. 

 Tyi)e: ¥. enthea. 



*) Smith says that my tyi)e of H ade na d i ve rs i 1 i n ea t a is a 

 patched speciinen of illeiiidä. The descriiitiou is totally differeut, therefore 

 the wiijpfs miist helony; to soiiie ot.hcr Hjiefies, at least the patclies. In this 

 case it is an absurdity t<i call the s])ecies by a naiiie based on a patched 

 Bjiecimen, because the inscct niust be recof^nised by the descrijition, which 

 in thifi rase is impossible. The description of H. diversilineata must be 

 cancelb d and tlie nanie droj)p('d. 1 reniember I was very dnubtful about the 

 iuH'ct; I was presscd for a report on the specimens, which 1 had to return 

 at once and have always had on it my raind that I onjjht to examine the type 

 over ap'ain. 



**) The identification by Butler and Smith of this spccies with Marne stra 

 luliens is contradicted by llie descripfion, and niy own direct Observation of 

 the type-, it is probably the rcKult of a transposition of the specimen. The 

 epecimen nf M. lubenw which now fiRures as the "type" of cristifera is most 

 probably, almont certainly, fbe one dcterniini'd by Walker, C. \i. M. 9, 230, 

 "W. Oriila, Canada, from Mr. Hush's colloction", as M a ni. brassicae. The 

 erroneus ileterraination of 1 übe na as brassicae came to me, cither from 

 Ijondon, Canada, or direct. I never comparcd the two nor did I originally 

 (leferniine lubens as brassicae. The nanic in American collections was 

 the reeult of Walker's original mistakcn determination of lubons as 

 brassicae. See Morris' Catalogue. Neither Hutler or Smith mention 

 brassicae Walk, from North America. 



