2-.2 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY 



-J 



which are returned by Dr. Kieffcr without names, and; which\ 

 are reserved for a supplementary paper as soon as I 

 can L^ct leisure to examine them with the aid of Dr. 

 Kieffcr's monograph. Among them is an example named: 

 by the Rev. T. A. Marshall, P. longiconiis, Hal, from Cadder 

 Wilderness, and which certainly agrees with Haliday's 

 description. As will be noticed. I.e. supra, Haliday records 

 this species from Edinburgh. The species new to the 

 British Fauna are marked ^. With P. fuscipes and P. 

 lo7igicornis, recorded by Haliday from the Edinburgh 

 District, this makes a total of i 3 Scottish species, of which 

 3 species and i named variety are additions to the British, 

 Fauna. 



Adde7idiim to Ceraphronin/e, ante, p. 159, July 1907. 



To Lagynodes add : — 



4. fiircifer, Marsh. 



Triogmus furcifer, Marshall, " Ent. Annual," 1874, p. 134. 

 Lagynodes fiircifer, Kieffer, " Ann. d. 1. Soc. Scientifique de 

 Bruxelles," xxx. (2) 148. Cadder Wilderness, one male. 



Kieffer is probably correct in suppressing Marshall's genus 

 Trioginus ; certainly the presence of 3 short spines on the meta- 

 thorax can hardly be regarded, as Kieffer properly points out. I.e., 

 as a point of generic distinction. ]\Iy specimen is a male, as was 

 also Marshall's type, from North Devon. The species would, 

 therefore, appear to have a wide distribution in Britain. 



Mierops, Halid., and Hadroeeras, Foer., are other generic 

 synonyms of Lagynodes. 



ON THE BRITISH PLANT LISTS AND THEIR 



DISCREPANCIES. 



By G. Claridge Druce, M.A., F.L.S. 



Three lists of British Plants have recently been issued, and 

 in your kindly review you alluded to some discrepancies to 

 be found in them. On the whole there is more agreement 

 between the " London Catalogue " and my " List," than might 

 have been expected considering they were approached from 

 different standards of nomenclature. In order to save space 



