72 Botanisches Centralblatt. 



Hennings, P. 1902. Ueber die Verbreitung und das Vorkommen von 

 Sphaerotheca mors uvae (Schw.), dem Stachelbeer-Meltau, in Russland. 

 (Gartenflora. Jahrg. 51. p. 170—171.) 

 Hennings, P. 1902. Zwei bemerkenswerte Pholiota-Arten aus dem Berliner 

 Botanischen Garten. (Verh. bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenburg. Jahrg. 43. 

 p. 119—120.) 

 King, Cyrus A. 1902. Fertilization and some Accompanying Phenomena 

 in Araiospora pulchra, one of the Aquatic Phycomycetes. [Meet. Bot. 

 Central States.] (Science. N. S. Vol. 15. p. 456—457.) 

 Klöcker, Alb. 1902. Gymnoascus flavus n. sp. (Hedwigia. Bd. -41. 



p. 80—83. 1 Taiel.) 

 Lindroth, J. T. 1901. Anmärkningsvärda rost- och brandsvampar Iran 

 Aland och Tavastland. (Meddel. Soc. Fauna Flora iennica. Haft 24. 

 p. 106—108.) 

 Lloyd, C. G. 1900. Mycological Notes. No. 5. p. 33—47. 20 iigg. 



[Collybias of Cincinnati. Two plants with peculiar spores.] 

 Lloyd, C. G. 1901. Mycological Notes. No. 6. p. 49—64. [Diagnoses of 

 new species of Fungi from Samoa. Pleurotus subpalmatus. Notes on 

 Tricholoma rutilans. Fungi tridentini. Prof. A t kinson ' s Book. Save 

 your puff balls. Notes on some common plants. Explanation of a 

 cut. A puzzling little plant. Nyctalis asterophora. Gynophragmium ? 

 decipiens. Nomenclature. Urnula craterium in Europe. Spore prints.] 

 Lloyd, C. G. 1901. Mycological Notes. No. 7. p. 65—72. 8 figg. 

 [Acknowledgment of „Puff Balls" received. Notes on Gastromycetes 

 received.] No. 8. p. 73—80. 9 figg.) 

 Lloyd, C. G. 1902. The Genera of Gastromycetes. (Bull. Lloyd Libr. 

 Bot. Pharm. Mat. med. No. 3. [Mycol. Ser. No. 1.] 12 pp. 11 pls. 

 14 figg.) 

 Magnus, P. 1902. Ueber eine neue unterirdisch lebende Art der Gattung 

 Urophlyctis. (Ber. deutsch, bot. Ges. Bd. 19. Gen.-Vers.-Heft. I. Theil. 

 p. [145]— [153]. 1 Taf.) 

 Menier, C. et Urb. Monnier. 1902. Recherches experimentales sur quel- 

 ques Agaricinees ä volve. [Amanites et Volvaires.] (Bull. Sc. pharm. 

 Ann. 4. p. 11 — 16.) 

 Növgaard, Victor A. 1901. Fusarium equinum [nov. spec.]. (Science. N. S. 



Vol. 14. p. S98— 899.) 

 Percival, John. 1902. Notes and observations on Plant-diseases. (Journ. 

 South-East. Agric. College, Wye. No. 11. [February 1902.] p. Sl— 89. 

 3 figg.) 

 Pötten M[ichael] C[resse]. 1902. On a canker of the Oak [Quercus Robur], 

 [Stereum quercinum, n. sp.] (Trans. Engl. Arbor. Soc. Carlisle. Vol. 5. 

 1901—02. p. 105—112. 4 figg.) 

 Pulst, Carl. 1902. Die Widerstandsfähigkeit einiger Schimmelpilze gegen 



Metallgifte. (Jahrb. wiss. Bot. Bd. 37, p. 205—263. 2 figg.) 

 Ranojevic, N. 1902. Beitrag zur Pilzflora Serbiens. (Hedwigia. Bd. 41. 



p. 89—96.) 

 Rechinger, Carl. 1902. Ueber ein seltenes Phytoptocecidium auf Artemisia 

 campestris L. und seine Aehnlichkeit mit Filago arvensis L. (Verh. 

 zool.-bot. Ges. Wien. Bd. 52. p. 152—153.) 

 Roland, L. 1902. Un Champignon nouveau pour la flore jurassienne, le 

 Tricholoma bisontinum Roiand. (Arch. Flore jurass. Ann. 3. No. 21. 

 p. 5—6.) 

 Saccardo, P. A. 1902. Sylloge Fungorum omnium hucusque cogmtorum. 

 Vol. 16. P. A. S. et P. Sydow. Supplementum universale. Pars V. 

 81 B. 81 frs. (Ref. Hedwigia. Bd. 41. p. 77.) 

 Schertel, S. 1902. Ueber Leuchtpilze; unsere gegenwärtigen Kenntnisse 

 von ihnen; ihr Vorkommen in Litteratur und Mythe. (Deutsche bot. 

 Monatsschr. Jahrg. 20. No. 3. p. 39—42. Fortsetzung folgt.) 

 Selby, Augtistine D. 1902. The Future of Vegetable Pathology. (Science. 



N. S. Vol. 15. p. 736—740.) 

 Simpson, J. 1902. The Disease of Larch [Larix]. (Gard. Chrom, London. 

 [3.] Vol. 31. p. 238—239, 256—257.) 



