SS Botanische? Centralblatt. 



Buscalioni, L. 1902. Sülle modificazioni provocata dai processi di mer- 

 cerizazione nei filati di Cotone. (Atti R. Istit. Bot. Univ. Pavia. N. S. 

 Vol. 7. c. Tav.) 



Cappelluti-Altomare, G. 1902. I semenzai del Tabacco e la Thielavia Basi- 

 cola Zopf. (R. Istituto di Scafati. 1902. p. 137—147.) 



Capus, J. 1902. Du role de l'effeuillage et du rognage dans la lutte 

 contre Ies parasites de la vigne, animaux et vegetaux. (Bull. Soc. Etudes 

 et Vulgarisation Zool. agric. Bordeaux. 1902. No. 1. p. 19—24.) 



Carleton, M. A. 1901. Maccaroni-wheats. (Bull. No. 3. Bureau of Plant 

 Industry U. S. Dept. of Agric. 62 pp. 4 pl.) 



Carpiaux, Em. 1902. La Chicorie „Witloof" et la formation des Chicous. 

 (Bull. Jnst. chim. et bacteriol. Gembloux. No. 70. p. 17—21.) 



Chevalier, Aug. 1902. L'avenir agricole du Senegal et du Soudan et la 

 eulture du cotonnier. (Journal d'Agriculture tropicale. 1902. p. 131 

 — 135.) 



Clark, F. Judson. 1902. On the toxic properties of some Gopper Com- 

 pounds with special Reference to Bordeaux Mixture. (Bot. Gaz. Vol. 33. 

 No. 1. p. 26—48. 7 Figg.) 



Cobb, N. A. 1902. Gomparative Observations on the Brush of about 

 Fifty (50) Varieties of Wheat. (Agric. Gaz. New South Wales. Vol. 13. 

 p. 647—649. 2 figg. 1 table.) 



Coleman, F. 1902. Experimental Wheats. (Agricultural Gazette New 

 South Wales Vol. 13. p. 386—389.) 



Cook, 0. F. 1902. Agriculture in the Tropical Islands of the United 

 States. (Yearb. U. S. Dept. Agric. 1901. p. 349—368. 6 pls.) 



Corbett, L. C. 1902. The Home Fruit Garden. (Yearb. U. S. Dept. Agric. 

 1901. p. 431—446. 5 figg.) 



Corboz, F. 1902. La eulture fouragere (suite et fin). (Chron. agric. 

 Ann. 15. p. 615—620.) 



Deherain, P. P. et C. Dupont. 1902. Culture du ble au champs d'exoeriences 

 de Grignon en 1902. (C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris. T. 135. p. 654—657. 

 Journ. Agric. prat. Ann. 66. p. 602 — 603.) 



Despeissis, A. 1902. Planting-Vine-planting. Tree-planting. (journ. Dep. 

 Agr. Western Australia. Vol. 5. p. 380—390. 3 figg.) 



Dewey, Lyster H. 1902. The Hemp Industry in the United States. (Yearb. 

 U. S. Dept. Agric. 1901. p. 541—554. 3 pls. 2 figg.) 



Dyer, Bernard. 1902. On Lucerne, with notes on some other leguminous 

 crops. (Transactions Highland and Agricultural Society Scotland. [3.] 

 Vol. 14. p. 1 — 16.) 



Eckstein, K. 1902. Ein vergleichender Versuch über die Anwendung 



einiger Mittel gegen Wildverbiss. (Zeitsehr. Forst- und Jagdw. Jahrg. 



31. Heft 9. p. 540—546.) 

 Emmerling, A. und C. A. Weber. 1901. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Dauer- 



ueide in den Marschen Norddeutschlands. (Arb. d. D. landw. Gesellsch. 



il. 61. 127 pp.) 

 Engler, A. 1902. Le resinage dans les forets de pins maritimes. D'apres 



une article de M. le prof. Eng ler ä Zürich, traduction abregee. 



(Journ. forest, suisse. Ann. 53. p. 193 — 200. 4 figg.) 

 Fairchild, D. G. 1902. The great forage and soiling crop of the Nile 



Valley. (Bull. No. 23. Bureau Plant Industry U. S. Department ot 



Agricult.) 

 von Feilitzen, H. 1902. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Wintei iestigkeit von 



Rotklee verschiedener Herkunft. (Deutsche landw. Presse. Jahrg. 29. 



p. 786— 7S7.) 



Fischer, M. 1901. Grün- und gelbkörniger Roggen, braun- und hell- 

 körniger Square-head Weizen als Züchtungsformen im feldmässigen 

 Anbau. (Fühling's landw. Zeitg. 1901. p. 684.) 



Foley, John. 1902. A Working Plan for Southern Hardwoods, and its 

 Results. (Yearb. U. S. Dept. Agric. 1901. p. 471—476. 3 pls.) 



