PSYCHOPHYSICAL DISCRIMINATION 



63 



o 

 o 



_j 

 o 



l" 



O 

 O 

 O 



-I 

 _J 

 U 



>■ 

 o 



a 

 < 



.SinOAIllllAI Nl A1ISN31NI QNOOS 



iO 



0» 

 O) 



00 





o 



0> 



o 



00 



o 



r- 



o 



I* 



o z 



S°- 



o 



o 



_ o 



rf> 



- AJ 



% 001 



Figure 4. — Comparison of theory with experiment: distribution of judgments 

 of relative loudness (data from Kellogg, 1930). The representation is the same 

 as that in Figure 3 except for the use of the logarithmic scale of intensities, 

 necessitated by the large relative range in the stimuli. 



