i to be joined to his H. aculeatus. Probably R 
ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. 447 
No. 56. add, N. rubra, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 657. 
— 57. add, N. Lotus, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 658. 
— 57. bis (4) N. edulis (DC.:) leaves oval, quite entire, downy under- 
neath ; margin sometimes very slightly waved ; lobes at the base diverging: 
petiole attached a little within the margin: flowers white: connectivum not 
prolonged: stigma 10-15-rayed.— DC. prod. 1. p. 115 ; Spr. syst. 2. p. 605.— 
N. esculenta, Rowb. fl. Ind. 2. p. 578; in E. I. C. mus. tab. 660.—Castalia 
edulis, Salisb. in Ann. Bot. 2. p. 73. Cirears ; Roxburgh. 
Flowers nearly 3 inches in diameter. 
— T 65. bis (2) Sinapis erysimoides (Roxb.)— Rowb. fl. Ind. 3. p. 128. 
Perhaps a variety of S. nigra. 
— +65. ter (3) S. pusilla (Roxb.)—Rowb. fl. Ind. 3. p. 125. 
The siliquee are described as filiform, the seeds compressed, and the stigma 
sessile, whence we presume it cannot belong to the present genus. We have 
not seen it. 
— 67. add, Cleome pentaphylla, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 608.— Rheed. 
Mal. 9. t. 24. es ^ : 
— 68. add, C. monophylla, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 1988. 
— 70. add, C. diffusa, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 340. 
— 72. add, Cleome Chelidonii, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 339. 
— 73. add, Cleome icosandra, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 669. 
— 76. add, Capparis trifolia, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 15. ; 
— 79. add, Capparis heterogenea, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 160. 
— 80. add, Cleome fruticosa, Row). in E. I. C. mus. tab. 667. 
— 81. add, Strcemia trifoliata, Rowb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 1798. 
— 88. add, C. zeylanica, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 161. 
— 92. add, C. sepiaria, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 159.—Pluk. t. 338. 
fol. 27. pl. 3. 
— 111. add, Chilmoria pentandra, Ham.! in Linn. soc. tr. 13. p. 501.— 
Rheed. Mal. 1. t. 36. 
— 116. add, Viola suffruticosa, Rowb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 1807. 
— 141. add, T. Indica, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 595. 
— 142. add, T. dioica, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 1390. 
— 146. add, Sagina ammannoides, Roab. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 552. ` 
— 148. add, Saponaria perfoliata, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 1242. 
— 165. add, U. lobata, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 154. — 
— 170. add, Hibiscus Zeylanicus, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 352. 
— 173. add, H. Surattensis, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 1504. 
The stems are described by Roxburgh, in the fl. Ind., as woody. ; 
— 174. add, We cannot see that H. aculeatus, Roxb. fl. Ind. 3. p. 206 (H. 
Surattensis, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 356), at all differs from this species, 
although the stems are said to be annual and flexuose, while H. fureatus is 
deseribed as erect and shrubby ; different soils and modes of cultivation may 
readily produce these variations: our own specimens do not exhibit the stem, 
so that we adopted that part of our character from Roxburgh's MSS : if, how- 
e ’ ies be really distinct, perhaps our one ought rather 
ee sites n ed. Mal. 6. t. 44 belongs to 
I 
this species instead of to H. Surattensis. 
