ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. 449 
No. 437. « (2) add, Gastonia Nalugu, Lam. ; Spr. syst. 2.p. 440.—Giliber- 
tia Nalugu, DC. prod. 4. p. 256. 
Page 140, line 5 from bottom, for oppositifolia, read filiformis. 
No. 463. add, Tytonia natans, G. Don in Mill. dict. 1. p. 749. 
— 491. add, Sambucus Canadensis, Burm. Ind. p. 15. 
— 545. for Anoma Moringa, Lour., read Anoma Morunga, Lour. 
— 563. add, Wight ! cat. n. 989. 
— 600. Crot. medicaginea ; for peduncles bearing 2 small flowers towards 
the apex ; read, peduncles bearing 2-5 small flowers towards the apex. 
— 615. We have very lately received specimens from Canton, China, from 
our friend Dr Hooker, and examined in his rich herbarium the New Holland 
plant ; we cannot perceive the least difference between them. 
— 642. Pueraria tuberosa: in Dr Hooker’s herbarium there are specimens 
of the legume, which appears as perfectly jointed as in Desmodium, to which 
genus we fear the present one must be reduced. 
— 648. Since the genus Norowi4 was printed, we have ascertained that 
De Candolle has also dedicated a genus to Mr Noton in Guillemin's Archives 
de Botanique for December 1833: although Wight's specimens and litho- 
graphic catalogue, containing No. 871 and 872, had been previousl distri- 
buted, we believe that, according to botanical rules, De Candolle's genus 
ought to be adopted. We therefore propose to change the name we had 
E to that of Jonna, in remembrance of the Dr Jon noticed in our pre- 
ce, Dr Roxburgh's Johnia being identical with Salacia. The species will 
thus be called J. Wightii (W. & A.).—To this genus probably also belongs 
Dolichos spicatus, Gr. in Wall. L. n. 5557, but we have neither examined the 
structure of its flowers nor seen the fruit. 
Ni 208, line 10 from bottom, for mucro above refers, read mucro alone 
refers. 
No. 718. for Wall.! L. n. 5671, read Wall.! L. n. 5761. 
Page 258, line 8, for 785 (4), read 792. bis (4). ` 
— — 316. Lumnrrzera. Three species of this genus have been described by Gau- 
dishaud in Freycinet’s voyage, p. 481, under Laguncularia : but these two genera, 
perhaps, scarcely differ; in Laguncularia, however, the petals are minute, the 
stigma capitate, fruit margined, and leaves opposite; in Lumnitzera the petals are 
twice the length of the calyx-limb, the stigma acute, fruit bluntly angled, and leaves 
alternate: Laguncularia belongs to the northern, Lumnitzera to the southern he- 
he phe Gaudichaud’s Lag. purpurea, from the Falkland Islands, is so closely al- 
lied to Lum. racemosa, that he quotes for it also Rheede’s figure, although Rheede 
says, ** flores candidi:” Lag. rosea, Gaud., from Manilla, appears to be our Lum. coc- 
cinea. 
No. 1114. add Celosia corymbosa, Roxb. in I. C. mus. tab. 587. 
— 1128. add Russelia Oldenlandioides, Roa. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 591. 
— 1129. add Russelia viscosa, Roxb. in E. I. C. mus. tab. 592. 
— 1203. add V. Wightianum, Wall. pl. As. rar. 2. p. 29. 
— 1208. add N. sterculisefolia, Ach. Rich. in Mem. de la Soc. Hist. Nat. 
p. 289. 
— 1209. Having only just seen M. Ach. Richard's memoir on the Rubiaceæ, 
in the 5th volume of the Mem. de la soc. d'hist. nat. de Paris, we may men- 
tion, that he continues to unite Ceph. chinensis, Lam. to N. purpurea, and 
forms of them a new genus, which he places in the tribe Zserfie ( distinguish- 
ed by a drupaceous fruit, containing several many-seeded nuts). We our- 
selves have not seen the fruit, but Roxburgh's description of it is at variance 
with that given by Richard: perhaps M. ichard may have examined the Ce- 
rf 
